Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 11/12/2007, 01:14 AM   #1
REEFY1
Registered Member
 
REEFY1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vinton,VA
Posts: 983
Rowaphos-phosban

Which one of these are better, And are the safest to us- I use to use Phosguard but heard it leatchs Metal into the tank and irratate corals? Any advice would be appreciated Thanks


REEFY1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/12/2007, 05:34 AM   #2
mxett
Registered Member
 
mxett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 384
Either rowaphos or phosban will work well. I have used both with success.


mxett is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/12/2007, 06:33 AM   #3
somethingphishy
Registered Member
 
somethingphishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fleetwood, pa
Posts: 852
Quote:
Originally posted by mxett
Either rowaphos or phosban will work well. I have used both with success.
i second the results


__________________
"Set the gearshift for the high gear
Of your soul, you've got to run like
An antelope out of control!"

Current Tank Info: 50g/20l sump
somethingphishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/12/2007, 06:39 AM   #4
silvers
Registered Member
 
silvers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ga
Posts: 356
All are pretty much the same as far as leaching metals into the water that depends more on the grandular size and how much flow you are pushing through it. If to much you grind the GFO releasing into the water coloum. At Two Part Solution they sell bulk GFO very cheap and it is the exact same as all the others as a matter of fact they will eaven let you know that all GFO comes from the same place in germany.


__________________
Lord knows Im weak wont somebody get me off this reef-Sublime

Current Tank Info: 120g
silvers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/12/2007, 08:11 AM   #5
AZDesertRat
Moved On
 
AZDesertRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NW Phoenix
Posts: 16,621
None of the GFO or GFH (basically the same things, one is shipped dry and one is shipped wet) medias will leach metals. The aluminum based materials will though so stick with GFO or GFH.


AZDesertRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/12/2007, 09:50 AM   #6
vaporize
Registered Member
 
vaporize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 750
so GFO = (type 1, ship dry, phosban)?
GFH = (type 2, ship wet, rowaphos) ?

Is there any difference in effectiveness? I read several conflicting reports on them


vaporize is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/12/2007, 12:02 PM   #7
AZDesertRat
Moved On
 
AZDesertRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NW Phoenix
Posts: 16,621
Nothing significant. They have both been used in the drinking water industry for years as an arsenic remover and neither has proven to be any better than the other.


AZDesertRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.