Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 02/03/2008, 06:20 PM   #1
TX26257
Registered Member
 
TX26257's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Littlefield, Tx
Posts: 212
flow suggestion

ok I have a 180g tank with coralife 1200 external pump return plus 2 korlia #4.... Im thinking of adding 3 maxijets 1200 on a red sea wave maker... what do you guyys think
too much
too little
just right

mixed reef


TX26257 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/03/2008, 06:30 PM   #2
SonyMan03
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mission Tx
Posts: 15
I'd do with 4 maxijets on a RSWM

I'm running 3mj1200's, Nanostream 6025 and a Mag5 on a 29g.


SonyMan03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/03/2008, 07:05 PM   #3
LobsterOfJustice
Recovering Detritophobe
 
LobsterOfJustice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 7,443
Those maxijets wont make a difference on that size tank unless you mod them with a high flow mod.


__________________
If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right.

I remember when zoanthids were called things like "green" and "orange" and not "reverse gorilla nipple."

Current Tank Info: 180g reef with all the bells and whistles
LobsterOfJustice is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/03/2008, 07:36 PM   #4
TX26257
Registered Member
 
TX26257's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Littlefield, Tx
Posts: 212
by my cal. my return pump is 1200 gph return with a about 3-4ft of hose

and korlia are 1200 gph

and if I add 4 maxi jets at 295gph+ 1180

so around 4780 gph is this still not enough. if not what pumps would you use with a red sea wave maker


TX26257 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/03/2008, 08:13 PM   #5
walkerbrody
lost ball in high weeds
 
walkerbrody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Gadsden, Al
Posts: 504
get a few sureflow mods for those maxijets on the wave timer. They work great.


__________________
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't--you're right."
— Henry Ford

Current Tank Info: 265 mixed reef, 110 fowlr, 40g fuge, 75g sump.
walkerbrody is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/03/2008, 10:36 PM   #6
WarrenG
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 738
I have the sureflow mods and they are very good. I used to use a RedSea Wavemaker but its cycles are too short to really get the water moving. Much better is the Chauvet 4005 timer $30). You can set the cycles for 2-15 minutes each. A couple of modded 1200's going one direction for 5+ minutes, then two more mods going the opposite direction for 5+ minutes will provide very good flow for the corals.

Studies show a flow rate of 10-15cm/s across the corals is ideal. GPH is not nearly as good a guide.


WarrenG is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/03/2008, 11:34 PM   #7
swilcoxen
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally posted by WarrenG
Studies show a flow rate of 10-15cm/s across the corals is ideal. GPH is not nearly as good a guide.
Just out of curiosity, how would one measure that?


swilcoxen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/04/2008, 09:52 AM   #8
LobsterOfJustice
Recovering Detritophobe
 
LobsterOfJustice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 7,443
Put some stuff like cyclopeeze in the tank, hold a ruler up to the tank, and grab a stopwatch

I agree, I would go for the maximods.


__________________
If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right.

I remember when zoanthids were called things like "green" and "orange" and not "reverse gorilla nipple."

Current Tank Info: 180g reef with all the bells and whistles
LobsterOfJustice is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/04/2008, 09:56 AM   #9
tkeracer619
Registered Member
 
tkeracer619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 17,289
I would mod the koralias using a trimmed dumas 3004 prop and a maxijet 900 or 1200 impeller. You will get more flow for next to nothing.


__________________
Hobby Experience: 9200ish gallons, 26 skimmers, and a handful of Kent Scrapers.
Current Tank:
Vortech Powered 600G SPS Tank w/ 100gal frag tank & 100g Sump. RK2-RK10 Skimmer. ReefAngel. Radium 20k.
tkeracer619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/04/2008, 09:58 AM   #10
swilcoxen
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally posted by LobsterOfJustice
Put some stuff like cyclopeeze in the tank, hold a ruler up to the tank, and grab a stopwatch
I had a feeling someone was going to say that! Fair enough though. Thanks!


swilcoxen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/04/2008, 12:35 PM   #11
WarrenG
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 738
Someone had to say it, but most of us didn't want to appear that geeky. I just watch bubbles or something and estimate.


The studies I read said that 10cm/s was likely best for prey capture, but the higher flow was better for respiration. If light levels are high then the higher levels would be best, especially if you can slow things down during feeding. But beyond 15cm/s there didn't seem to be any benefits.


WarrenG is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/04/2008, 01:02 PM   #12
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by LobsterOfJustice
Those maxijets wont make a difference on that size tank unless you mod them with a high flow mod.
I was going to do that but was told if you mod them they won't work on a variable timer anymore


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/04/2008, 01:06 PM   #13
swilcoxen
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally posted by WarrenG
Someone had to say it, but most of us didn't want to appear that geeky. I just watch bubbles or something and estimate.


The studies I read said that 10cm/s was likely best for prey capture, but the higher flow was better for respiration. If light levels are high then the higher levels would be best, especially if you can slow things down during feeding. But beyond 15cm/s there didn't seem to be any benefits.
Geeky is good. I'm running a 29G tank and I added a second power head (I use the Koralia Nano's). Depending upon how they're positioned I do one of two things. I either beat certain areas to death or I end up with serious dead spots. In theory I'm pushing almost 500 gallons of water an hour, but, as someone indicated, if there's a dead spot, there's a dead spot. GPH isn't then ultimate answer if it doesn't hit the right places. Areas of my tank are definitely in the 10-15 cm/s range, while others are easily at 5 cm/s or even less. I'm probably obsessing too much at this point....


swilcoxen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/04/2008, 08:50 PM   #14
thi7b
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
IMO It depend what you want to keep. SPS need high flow rate. That flow rate is ok for softies. You may see some cyano on the sand. I used to have 5 koralia 4 on a 125gal. It was too much then cut down to 4. But I still have that ugly cyano on my sand bed. Then I try out my first vortech. It gave me the flow and the cyano went alway in 3 days. I end up buying a second vortech and selling all my koralia 4.


thi7b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/05/2008, 12:57 PM   #15
WarrenG
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 738
Quote:
Originally posted by thi7b
IMO It depend what you want to keep. SPS need high flow rate. That flow rate is ok for softies.
The study I read (advanced aquarist.com) said that 10-15cm/s was optimal in a reef tank for SPS. At the low end the prey capture was good and at the high end the respiration was better. If the corals show signs of photoinhibition then the upper end of that range would be helpful, but beyond that range there wasn't significant benefit to the corals.


WarrenG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.