Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:18 PM   #1
schoch79
Registered Member
 
schoch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hegins,pa
Posts: 1,071
24 gallon aquapod stocking questions

Ok., so I just set up my tank and I am familiar with the rules and procedures of starting/maintaining an aquarium. That being said as stated in the title the tank is a 24 gal. aquapod. I know I want two occelaris clowns but was also considering one or two firefish, and/or one of the following diamond watchman goby, yellow watchman goby, court jester goby(never seen these at lfs's around here), or a saifin blenny. I was immediately swayed from the sailfin when I saw how they were larger than the rest but I really don't know. Can someone please give their input on this. Thanks in advance.


__________________
We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly.
schoch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:22 PM   #2
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
It can be a problem adding more then one blennie to that size of tank

http://www.liveaquaria.com/product/scateg.cfm?pCatId=23


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:23 PM   #3
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
3 or 4 blue green chromies would be nice and they would school together as would 3 or 4 bangi cardinals


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:25 PM   #4
schoch79
Registered Member
 
schoch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hegins,pa
Posts: 1,071
Understood but thank you. The intent was one of any of the fish at the end plus definately the two clowns and possibly one or two of the firefish.


__________________
We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly.
schoch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:28 PM   #5
schoch79
Registered Member
 
schoch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hegins,pa
Posts: 1,071
I think the biggest concern of mine, especially noting the fish that you suggested is the bioload. Keep in mind this is only a 24 gallon tank. I am pretty set on the two clowns but just need advice on whether 1-2 firefish and any of the listed blennies/gobies would be appropriate in that size tank.


__________________
We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly.
schoch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:28 PM   #6
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by schoch79
Understood but thank you. The intent was one of any of the fish at the end plus definately the two clowns and possibly one or two of the firefish.
the clowns and the firefish great and one or two bleenies max--if you have lots of rock cover
I love my sailfin blennie and so do my grandkids--they think it is a t-rex when it puffs up the sail(dorsal) fin


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:31 PM   #7
schoch79
Registered Member
 
schoch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hegins,pa
Posts: 1,071
You don't think that is too much bioload? I was afraid I was pushing it with just the clowns. I just don't want to make a mistake that is so easy to avoid.


__________________
We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly.
schoch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:31 PM   #8
schoch79
Registered Member
 
schoch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hegins,pa
Posts: 1,071
BTW I really appreciate your help with this. And such quick replies too.


__________________
We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly.
schoch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:40 PM   #9
Norward
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 407
I think your plan is sound. 24g should handle 2 of the smaller clown species, a firefish and a blenny. A protein skimmer will help immensely with the bio-load. Do an internet search for "lgreen's ultimate nano-reef stocking guide" for a solid reference. Good luck!



Last edited by Norward; 02/10/2008 at 10:50 PM.
Norward is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:44 PM   #10
schoch79
Registered Member
 
schoch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hegins,pa
Posts: 1,071
Well, as said above thanks lots. I really do appreciate the advice. This has helped to relax me a little because I would like the diversity of fish in there but most of all want a healthy tank.


__________________
We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly.
schoch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2008, 10:48 PM   #11
schoch79
Registered Member
 
schoch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hegins,pa
Posts: 1,071
Hmm, how do I save it to my browser?


__________________
We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly.
schoch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 01:45 PM   #12
Savas
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland / St. Thomas once a month
Posts: 764
I use the 6 gallons per small fish rule to for all my nanos.

Plus get rid of your bioballs and sponge filters and replace them with live rock rubble.


__________________
If you can get your wife hooked into reef keeping, you can spend all the money you want!

Current Tank Info: 24 gallon Aquapod Nanotuners 4.32 T-5 lighting upgrade; 24 gallon Aquapod with stock power compacts and actinic lighting; 12 gallon Aquapod with stock power compacts and actinic lighting.
Savas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 01:54 PM   #13
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by schoch79
You don't think that is too much bioload? I was afraid I was pushing it with just the clowns. I just don't want to make a mistake that is so easy to avoid.
if you have 25 lbs of live rock and a sand bed then you will be fine with that bioload


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 01:56 PM   #14
Savas
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland / St. Thomas once a month
Posts: 764
I agree with Capn, but I usually do...


__________________
If you can get your wife hooked into reef keeping, you can spend all the money you want!

Current Tank Info: 24 gallon Aquapod Nanotuners 4.32 T-5 lighting upgrade; 24 gallon Aquapod with stock power compacts and actinic lighting; 12 gallon Aquapod with stock power compacts and actinic lighting.
Savas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 01:57 PM   #15
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Savas
I use the 6 gallons per small fish rule to for all my nanos.

I used to believe in the rule and even post that rule--but not anymore. With knowledge of live rock and sand beds being the best biological filtration there is and protein skimmers, refugiums phosban and carbon reactors---they have raised the bar in that concept.
So know it becomes a matter of fish husbandry--what species are reef safe, which get along with each other, which are territoria, which need lots of swimming room ete ect.


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 01:59 PM   #16
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Savas

Plus get rid of your bioballs and sponge filters and replace them with live rock rubble. [/B]
Excellent point but--------
I did not see any mention of the filtration system and tank flow
how much live rock etc

What are these parameters schoch ??


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 02:01 PM   #17
Savas
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland / St. Thomas once a month
Posts: 764
They key here is "nanos" - assuming no skimmer, reactor, etc..., just an all-in-one nano. With a 50 gallo sump on a nano you could keep a much larger bio-load than a standard tank.


__________________
If you can get your wife hooked into reef keeping, you can spend all the money you want!

Current Tank Info: 24 gallon Aquapod Nanotuners 4.32 T-5 lighting upgrade; 24 gallon Aquapod with stock power compacts and actinic lighting; 12 gallon Aquapod with stock power compacts and actinic lighting.
Savas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 02:15 PM   #18
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Savas
They key here is "nanos" - assuming no skimmer, reactor, etc..., just an all-in-one nano. With a 50 gallo sump on a nano you could keep a much larger bio-load than a standard tank.


right on thanks savas


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 02:16 PM   #19
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Savas
They key here is "nanos" - assuming no skimmer, reactor, etc..., just an all-in-one nano. With a 50 gallo sump on a nano you could keep a much larger bio-load than a standard tank.
in these nanos--do you still go by one pound of live rock per gallon?


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 02:17 PM   #20
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Savas
I agree with Capn, but I usually do...
I didn't see this one till now---gee talk to my wife will you


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 02:20 PM   #21
Savas
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland / St. Thomas once a month
Posts: 764
Yes, although I usually stock less live rock, about 18 pounds, in my AP24 and assume I'll get the remaining 6 pounds as base on my corals. I have about 6 pounds of rock as my filter material - SK8r finally convinced me to remove the man-made filters.


__________________
If you can get your wife hooked into reef keeping, you can spend all the money you want!

Current Tank Info: 24 gallon Aquapod Nanotuners 4.32 T-5 lighting upgrade; 24 gallon Aquapod with stock power compacts and actinic lighting; 12 gallon Aquapod with stock power compacts and actinic lighting.
Savas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 02:27 PM   #22
Fun $ Pit
Registered Member
 
Fun $ Pit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Collierville, Tennessee
Posts: 302
You have a nano right? Lets look at nano-sized fish.

My personal favorite for this setup are the neon nano gobies.


__________________
Thank you. Drive Thru!

Current Tank Info: 180G - See my Gallery
Fun $ Pit is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 03:11 PM   #23
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Savas
Yes, although I usually stock less live rock, about 18 pounds, in my AP24 and assume I'll get the remaining 6 pounds as base on my corals. I have about 6 pounds of rock as my filter material - SK8r finally convinced me to remove the man-made filters.
sk8r is definetly the right guy to listen to--but we are talking nanos here right
I wouldn't want to remove my protein skimmer despite my refugium and possible mangroves and mud


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 04:41 PM   #24
schoch79
Registered Member
 
schoch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hegins,pa
Posts: 1,071
Well, to answer some questions first thing I did was ditch all of the filtration media that came with it. I now have the right hand compartment half filled with rubble and am leaving the top half to use carbon and/or a phosphate adsorber. In the main part of the tank I have about 25-30 lbs of live rock. I have no skimmer due to the nature of the aquapods design and have no sump or phosban reactors and the such. My intented tank flow will be the stock pump(I know I should upgrade to a maxijet) and a maxi 400 in the display. My plans aside from fish will be soft corals so I don't want to use too much flow. Um, I think that about covers it. I really appreciate all the input guys. Thanks a lot.


__________________
We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly.
schoch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2008, 05:14 PM   #25
rlm2005
Registered Member
 
rlm2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego Area
Posts: 432
I have a 24 Nanocube and a 24 Aquapod and run both without skimmers. I had a fission skimmer on the Nanocube a couple of years ago, it was junk and ended up in the trash. The key is regular water changes and good flow. My Nanocube has been up and running for over 3 years now, parameters are 0's across the board. Both tanks have a pair of clowns and various inverts and soft corals. My Aquapod also has a Royal Gramma as well as the clowns.


rlm2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.