Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 05/29/2009, 12:14 PM   #1
camaroracer214
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 332
ORA Platinum Picasso

ORA has just released a new clownfish...the ORA Platinum Picasso. Very pricey.

Feel free to share your information here, we do not allow linking that directs to your own site, blog or not.~dc



Last edited by dc; 06/05/2009 at 11:09 AM.
camaroracer214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 12:15 PM   #2
Anemone0524
Registered Member
 
Anemone0524's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NoVA
Posts: 434
saw that -

I know they're rare, but they don't look good to me at all. :|


__________________
Aaron


150g rimless 60x30x20, ATI Sunpower x8, 2 48" Reefbrite Blue LED, MSX 200, Vortech MP40w x 2, BRS CA/ALK Dosers, Biopellets and GFO
Anemone0524 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 12:38 PM   #3
camaroracer214
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 332
my personal favorite is the grade a picasso. unique, but not retarded looking.


camaroracer214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 12:40 PM   #4
L98-Z
Registered Member
 
L98-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Warner Robins, Georgia
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally posted by Anemone0524
saw that -

I know they're rare, but they don't look good to me at all. :|
Agreed.


L98-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 12:41 PM   #5
Peter Eichler
Registered Member
 
Peter Eichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,081
I'm holding out for the lionhead or bubble eye clownfish


__________________
April 2015 TOTM
Peter Eichler is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 12:44 PM   #6
jmadison
rebmeM deretsigeR
 
jmadison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PHX, AZ
Posts: 1,426
Eh, not a fan sorry.


__________________
-Keyser Söze-


By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest. -Confucius

Current Tank Info: Construction Zone
jmadison is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 12:52 PM   #7
swjim
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boerne, TX
Posts: 884
Ugly and expensive.

Someone will buy them.


swjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 01:02 PM   #8
fishkid6692
Registered Member
 
fishkid6692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: danbury, CT
Posts: 3,193
the older one is kind of sick looking. if they have all black fins i think they would be cool. but for 750 a fish idk. i thought they were going to be 750 a pair and i would've got them.


__________________
~matt~

Current Tank Info: 180g - 4' by 3' by 2'. bubbleking mini 180, apex controller, (2) vortech mp40's, phosban reactor, geissmen moonlight fixture
fishkid6692 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 01:04 PM   #9
Stripe01
Moved On
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Napa
Posts: 411
uuh looks like their covered with fungus.


Stripe01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 01:11 PM   #10
DT's_Reef
Registered Member
 
DT's_Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 3,083
Looks like they're not quite cooked enough....


__________________
85g starphire system, 38"x26"x20", 250w Radium SE + Galaxy Ballast + Lumenmax Elite reflector, Tunze Nano Wave Box, 2 Tunze Nano Streams, Profilux dosing system (2-part + vodka), ATB 840 Skimmer, Eheim 1262 return pump.
DT's_Reef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 01:26 PM   #11
camaroracer214
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 332
c'mon guys, are they really that bad? i think they look kind of cool. i'm not willing to drop $1500 for a pair, but if the price was right i wouldn't mind owning a set.


camaroracer214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 01:28 PM   #12
luther1200
Premium Member
 
luther1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NJ, shore
Posts: 4,376
I don't know, I kinda like them.


__________________
Matt, 65G reef tank

Current Tank Info: 65g reef, mix of sps, lps, few softies. Hoping to upgrade within the year.
luther1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 01:31 PM   #13
fufu
Registered Member
 
fufu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 432
Cheaper and look better than the $6000 Mcculloch's Clownfish


fufu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 01:36 PM   #14
fsn77
Registered Member
 
fsn77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 777
Unique / different -- yes. Worth $750 / fish -- IMO no.
Those won't be going on my list of "must haves" anytime soon, that's for sure. I don't find them to be all that desirable.


fsn77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 02:00 PM   #15
blange3
Brewer and Reefer
 
blange3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodbridge, NJ
Posts: 1,126
I think the original designer did a better job than on all of ORA's pricey mutations.


__________________
Bill

Current Tank Info: 180gal with 100 gal Sump CSS Octopus NW150, Mag 18 return, Jebao RW20, 2xMJ 900's 320w VHO Actinics and 320w overdriven T5's coming back online after a FW break
blange3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 02:56 PM   #16
lvreefer
Registered Member
 
lvreefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,163
I thought the highlight of saltwater was that the fish are colorful. If one is looking for that rare fish that no one has, I can think of a lot better choices.
Its kinda funny that ORA is now producing fish not found in the ocean since their mission statement has been to conserve the natural reefs. I knew they were going the wrong direction when they introduced the indigo dottyback. It seems that they've hit a road block when it comes to breeding natural specimens.


lvreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 03:03 PM   #17
luther1200
Premium Member
 
luther1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NJ, shore
Posts: 4,376
They are preserving the natural reef, by not harvesting it for new fish. They breed there own.


__________________
Matt, 65G reef tank

Current Tank Info: 65g reef, mix of sps, lps, few softies. Hoping to upgrade within the year.
luther1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 03:12 PM   #18
billdogg
Registered Member
 
billdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Grove City, Ohio
Posts: 10,806
if it was a dog it'd be a mutt. JM.02 - certainly different, but $750??? not a chance.


__________________
I'll try to be nice if you try to be smarter!
I can't help that I grow older, but you can't make me grow up!

Current Tank Info: 120 mixed reef with 40b sump, RO 150 skimmer, AI Sol Blue x 2, and a 60g Frag Tank with 100g rubbermaid sump. 2 x Kessil A360w lights, BM curve 5 skimmer
billdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 04:25 PM   #19
lvreefer
Registered Member
 
lvreefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally posted by luther1200
They are preserving the natural reef, by not harvesting it for new fish. They breed there own.
With fish that don't exist on the reef... Then hike the price so high that people can't afford it... so they buy wild anyways. I just don't understand it. I realize its a business and they need to make money. I just wish they would look at the industry, see what's collected the most and work on those. It might not be as exciting, but it would certainly help the reefs.


lvreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 04:26 PM   #20
camaroracer214
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally posted by lvreefer
I thought the highlight of saltwater was that the fish are colorful. If one is looking for that rare fish that no one has, I can think of a lot better choices.
Its kinda funny that ORA is now producing fish not found in the ocean since their mission statement has been to conserve the natural reefs. I knew they were going the wrong direction when they introduced the indigo dottyback. It seems that they've hit a road block when it comes to breeding natural specimens.
well, conserving a reef means that they are not harvesting fish, corals, and invertebrates. ora gets their hands on a handful of animals and breeds/propagates them.

and these fish are all mutations. the picasso, snowflake, **name removed because of legal threat from trademark holder**, naked, etc all came from more natural looking parents. they just so happen to have recessive traits that are pronounced in a handful of babies from a clutch of 400-500+ eggs.

i think that it's pretty neat that the fish are capable of the colors they are getting. in nature, very few fish offspring survive, so the occurrence of running into a picasso or snowflake in the wild are next to none...but the traits are still there, just recessive.


camaroracer214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 04:40 PM   #21
lvreefer
Registered Member
 
lvreefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally posted by camaroracer214
...but the traits are still there, just recessive.
i understand that, but they are recessive for a reason. And at $750 a pop, how much are they helping?


lvreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 04:42 PM   #22
cccapt
Registered Member
 
cccapt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: N.E. PA
Posts: 842
Those are horrid.
.....and some ppl thought the hybrids Sanjay bred were ugly?


__________________
/Larry

Current Tank Info: 125 reef
cccapt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 04:56 PM   #23
rendogg
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Abbotsford, B.C.
Posts: 578
To quote Mr. T, "I pity the fool" who shells out $750 for a mutant clownfish, it's not even nice to look at.


rendogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 05:10 PM   #24
luther1200
Premium Member
 
luther1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NJ, shore
Posts: 4,376
I'm not saying I would pay that kind of money or anything. But this type of thing is nothing new. It wouldn't be a mutt if it were a dog. Most of todays dogs have been selective bread over hundreds of years for the qualitys people like. Then they are pure bread. The same goes for many cats. And tha fact is that these fish were born, not cooked up in a lab or something. So just because they look different they shouldn't try to sell them? They will probably have a better life than many other clownfish. Because I'm sure if somebody shelld out $1500 for a pair they are going to keep extra good care of them.


__________________
Matt, 65G reef tank

Current Tank Info: 65g reef, mix of sps, lps, few softies. Hoping to upgrade within the year.
luther1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/29/2009, 05:48 PM   #25
iFisch
Registered Member
 
iFisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 3,068
Disgusting. Eeek. And they have the balls to "sell" this fish? ***!?


From what I have seen locally, I really like the grade B (B+) picasso's this one store gets. Extremely beautiful fish. If I were to buy any, it would be the one I have (extreme misbar false perc) or grade B picasso's. Even though I can afford a grade A or even "Platinum" fish.


iFisch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.