Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07/18/2009, 07:11 PM   #1
insane
Moved On
 
insane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: under your bed
Posts: 771
Blog Entries: 7
High volume filters

I will be building a new 135g SPS reef from scratch and plan on 1,000gph flow (7.4 x turnover). I am thinking of installing a double unit high pressure mechanical/chemical filter inline on my return with 100 micron poly screen cartridge.
This is the style.

It measures 13" wide x 13" tall for a single unit. 26" tall for the double with 8" needed for clearance to remove cartridge.

They state that a single one will do a 90g tank with a 1,200gph flow rate and a double will do a 180g. It has both ¾” and 1” inputs/outputs, pressure gauge and drain port. I plan on using a return pump rated at about 1,200gph at 4’ head with 1” ports and a 1” return line split to two ¾” bulkheads. Each ¾” bulkhead split to two ½” loc-line with flare nozzles to get my 1,000gph.

What do you guys/gals think? I want to avoid having a half dozen pumps running and as always, limited space next to an unusual sized glass sump I designed and am building. I think using a double unit like this will help with not reducing flow too much. Also, do you think the loc-line configuration can handle 250gph for each nozzle?

Everything is still in process of design so all parts are flexible at this point as to filter, lines, pumps, bulkheads, etc.
Any suggestions/warnings would be appreciated.

Thanks
Frank


insane is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2009, 07:35 PM   #2
GSMguy
Registered Member
 
GSMguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern New Mexico
Posts: 17,420
those are not for reef tanks.

you need a protein skimmer.

7.4x turnover is too much for most sumps and too little to keep fish and corals healthy that is why most of us use less flow thru the sump and have powerheads or closed loops in the tank.


__________________
Nick.
Conehead.
Shallow Reef club.

Current Tank Info: 48"x27"x14" Envision Acrylic rimless, 6x39w ATi Sunpower, Custom ATB Deluxe Skimmer, 4x tunze nano stream,ATB flowstar 1500, ACJR, Tunze osmolator.
GSMguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2009, 08:44 PM   #3
insane
Moved On
 
insane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: under your bed
Posts: 771
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally posted by GSMguy
those are not for reef tanks.

you need a protein skimmer.

7.4x turnover is too much for most sumps and too little to keep fish and corals healthy that is why most of us use less flow thru the sump and have powerheads or closed loops in the tank.
The 7.4x turnover will be in addition to a vortech mp40w. Protein skimmer is a given, will be a Reef Octopus Extreme 200. Sump will be custom 30x24x18 or possibly even 30x30x18 which will also have a fuge in it. The main reason I was thinking about that filter is for the chemical filtration using carbon for polishing. They do make that same type of cannister with only chemical filtration. Would that be better? Even if it only was filled with carbon when needed and kept empty the rest of the time. Possibly even use it with half bioballs and the other half for carbon as needed. I want to concentrate on SPS and have a gyre wave. I don't want to pack the tank with tons of live rock but have more of an open bottom pyramid of live rock. Like a spider with 4 legs as the tank will be 36" square x 24" tall.


insane is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2009, 10:44 PM   #4
rezaktp
Registered Member
 
rezaktp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gurnee, IL
Posts: 1,407
Use carbon in a reactor and a filter sock, remember these mechanical filters are known as "Nitrate Factories" in reef tanks!


__________________
Happy Reefing!

Current Tank Info: 180g. Reef w/8-80w t-5's, 70g. Rubbermaid basement sump w/10g. fuge, APEX, Reef Octopus SRO 2000 Skimmer, 1/3hp Aqualogic chiller, 57w Aqua Ultraviolet UV, BRS 2-part w/2-Drews Dosers, 4-MP40wES
rezaktp is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2009, 11:50 PM   #5
just dave
11th in '11
 
just dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 4,394
I have nine such units in operation ( a mixture of Nuclear and Ocean Clear ) and IMO they have their uses in reef tanks as well as fish only tanks. I run mine on bypass legs so they have no effect on system output when they start to clog and I can service them without shutting the systems down. A mechanical filter is a mechanical filter whether it's pleated,filter floss, felt sock, or whatever. The problems arise when they are not kept clean and units that are harder to service may end up being serviced less. Though one could argue that the use of filter socks could also be serviced less even though they are easy to remove and service due to the fact that in most applications when they clog the do not cause a decrease in system performance and for that reason may be ignored. I use mine mostly for carbon. When I do use the pleated cartridges it is for a short term. Even when they are used with carbon they will become a mechanical filter ( they will hold about seven pounds of carbon when full.) I prefer the Ocean Clear units as long as the can be mounted using their mounting feet. There is a larger unit out by Patriot Filters.


just dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/19/2009, 08:46 AM   #6
insane
Moved On
 
insane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: under your bed
Posts: 771
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally posted by just dave
I have nine such units in operation ( a mixture of Nuclear and Ocean Clear ) and IMO they have their uses in reef tanks as well as fish only tanks. I run mine on bypass legs so they have no effect on system output when they start to clog and I can service them without shutting the systems down. A mechanical filter is a mechanical filter whether it's pleated,filter floss, felt sock, or whatever. The problems arise when they are not kept clean and units that are harder to service may end up being serviced less. Though one could argue that the use of filter socks could also be serviced less even though they are easy to remove and service due to the fact that in most applications when they clog the do not cause a decrease in system performance and for that reason may be ignored. I use mine mostly for carbon. When I do use the pleated cartridges it is for a short term. Even when they are used with carbon they will become a mechanical filter ( they will hold about seven pounds of carbon when full.) I prefer the Ocean Clear units as long as the can be mounted using their mounting feet. There is a larger unit out by Patriot Filters.
I like the bypass option. Are you using your units on seperate tanks or in series or paralell? Which types do you use? Mechanical only, mechanical plus chemical, mechanical with UV, chemical only, biological only or empty? I liked the NuClear because you can extend them. Now I am thinking 2 seperate units with bypass on one used for occasional chemical filtration while using another for biological only filtration. Probably filling it with live rock rubble that is large enough to not get compacted. So much for simplified plumbing! LOL

In the past I had mainly relied on live rock for biological filtration and being how I want to do this reef with considerably less live rock I know I need to boost the biological filtration up a notch or two. I had also kept plenty of live rock in the sumps input because it got the most oxygen there. I do not want to use a wet/dry.

I won't be using filter socks because I want everything to go through the fuge to feed it. I prefer doing target feedings with all pumps off (15 minutes) and cycling them on for a few seconds and off again (15 minutes) after the initial feeding to distribute the foods in the tank. Once pumps are turned back on I want the remaining food to go into the fuge, then to the skimmer to remove the excess. I did it like this 3 times a week on my last reef.

I have looked at reactors but they cannot handle a very high flow, at least not the ones I have seen. I want to keep my return line and fittings all at 1" until I split it to the two 3/4" bulkeads.

Besides proper filtration, my main goal is reduction of number of pumps needed (electricity used, additional plumbing, space taken up and heat added). Same as with a UV. I have to over size it to have it inline with the flow I want to achieve while having it be able to do the job intended. Am considering the 40watt Gama UV with 2" slip input/output and 2880gph flow rate. Rated for a 200g tank.


insane is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/19/2009, 10:14 PM   #7
just dave
11th in '11
 
just dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 4,394
Quote:
Originally posted by insane
I like the bypass option. Are you using your units on seperate tanks or in series or paralell? Which types do you use? Mechanical only, mechanical plus chemical, mechanical with UV, chemical only, biological only or empty?
Some are separate and some are in series. Mechanical and chemical. The mechanical units are used temporarily and empty most of the time.


just dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/20/2009, 09:51 PM   #8
dennisdeng2002
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 57
Anyone know what kind of restriction two canisters would create, IE in terms of head height?


dennisdeng2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/21/2009, 11:34 AM   #9
dennisdeng2002
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 57
Bump, I really need some kind of ballpark answer, I don't want to end up buying a really over/under sized pump


dennisdeng2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.