|
07/18/2009, 07:11 PM | #1 |
Moved On
|
High volume filters
I will be building a new 135g SPS reef from scratch and plan on 1,000gph flow (7.4 x turnover). I am thinking of installing a double unit high pressure mechanical/chemical filter inline on my return with 100 micron poly screen cartridge.
This is the style. It measures 13" wide x 13" tall for a single unit. 26" tall for the double with 8" needed for clearance to remove cartridge. They state that a single one will do a 90g tank with a 1,200gph flow rate and a double will do a 180g. It has both ¾” and 1” inputs/outputs, pressure gauge and drain port. I plan on using a return pump rated at about 1,200gph at 4’ head with 1” ports and a 1” return line split to two ¾” bulkheads. Each ¾” bulkhead split to two ½” loc-line with flare nozzles to get my 1,000gph. What do you guys/gals think? I want to avoid having a half dozen pumps running and as always, limited space next to an unusual sized glass sump I designed and am building. I think using a double unit like this will help with not reducing flow too much. Also, do you think the loc-line configuration can handle 250gph for each nozzle? Everything is still in process of design so all parts are flexible at this point as to filter, lines, pumps, bulkheads, etc. Any suggestions/warnings would be appreciated. Thanks Frank |
07/18/2009, 07:35 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern New Mexico
Posts: 17,420
|
those are not for reef tanks.
you need a protein skimmer. 7.4x turnover is too much for most sumps and too little to keep fish and corals healthy that is why most of us use less flow thru the sump and have powerheads or closed loops in the tank.
__________________
Nick. Conehead. Shallow Reef club. Current Tank Info: 48"x27"x14" Envision Acrylic rimless, 6x39w ATi Sunpower, Custom ATB Deluxe Skimmer, 4x tunze nano stream,ATB flowstar 1500, ACJR, Tunze osmolator. |
07/18/2009, 08:44 PM | #3 | |
Moved On
|
Quote:
|
|
07/18/2009, 10:44 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gurnee, IL
Posts: 1,407
|
Use carbon in a reactor and a filter sock, remember these mechanical filters are known as "Nitrate Factories" in reef tanks!
__________________
Happy Reefing! Current Tank Info: 180g. Reef w/8-80w t-5's, 70g. Rubbermaid basement sump w/10g. fuge, APEX, Reef Octopus SRO 2000 Skimmer, 1/3hp Aqualogic chiller, 57w Aqua Ultraviolet UV, BRS 2-part w/2-Drews Dosers, 4-MP40wES |
07/18/2009, 11:50 PM | #5 |
11th in '11
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 4,394
|
I have nine such units in operation ( a mixture of Nuclear and Ocean Clear ) and IMO they have their uses in reef tanks as well as fish only tanks. I run mine on bypass legs so they have no effect on system output when they start to clog and I can service them without shutting the systems down. A mechanical filter is a mechanical filter whether it's pleated,filter floss, felt sock, or whatever. The problems arise when they are not kept clean and units that are harder to service may end up being serviced less. Though one could argue that the use of filter socks could also be serviced less even though they are easy to remove and service due to the fact that in most applications when they clog the do not cause a decrease in system performance and for that reason may be ignored. I use mine mostly for carbon. When I do use the pleated cartridges it is for a short term. Even when they are used with carbon they will become a mechanical filter ( they will hold about seven pounds of carbon when full.) I prefer the Ocean Clear units as long as the can be mounted using their mounting feet. There is a larger unit out by Patriot Filters.
|
07/19/2009, 08:46 AM | #6 | |
Moved On
|
Quote:
In the past I had mainly relied on live rock for biological filtration and being how I want to do this reef with considerably less live rock I know I need to boost the biological filtration up a notch or two. I had also kept plenty of live rock in the sumps input because it got the most oxygen there. I do not want to use a wet/dry. I won't be using filter socks because I want everything to go through the fuge to feed it. I prefer doing target feedings with all pumps off (15 minutes) and cycling them on for a few seconds and off again (15 minutes) after the initial feeding to distribute the foods in the tank. Once pumps are turned back on I want the remaining food to go into the fuge, then to the skimmer to remove the excess. I did it like this 3 times a week on my last reef. I have looked at reactors but they cannot handle a very high flow, at least not the ones I have seen. I want to keep my return line and fittings all at 1" until I split it to the two 3/4" bulkeads. Besides proper filtration, my main goal is reduction of number of pumps needed (electricity used, additional plumbing, space taken up and heat added). Same as with a UV. I have to over size it to have it inline with the flow I want to achieve while having it be able to do the job intended. Am considering the 40watt Gama UV with 2" slip input/output and 2880gph flow rate. Rated for a 200g tank. |
|
07/19/2009, 10:14 PM | #7 | |
11th in '11
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 4,394
|
Quote:
|
|
07/20/2009, 09:51 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 57
|
Anyone know what kind of restriction two canisters would create, IE in terms of head height?
|
07/21/2009, 11:34 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 57
|
Bump, I really need some kind of ballpark answer, I don't want to end up buying a really over/under sized pump
|
|
|