Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 12/23/2009, 10:38 AM   #1
rangerD275
Registered Member
 
rangerD275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 167
Has anyone switched back to MH from T5?

I currently have a 34 gallon Solana with a 14k 150W HQI. I am in the process of building a 150 XH (48x24x30) mixed reef. I've been trying to decide on lighting for two months now and I really need to make a decision.

I see a lot of folks switching to T5's...my question is, are there folks out there that have switched back to Halides? If so, why?

I like the look and shimmer of my halides, but in truth I haven't seen a tank in person with a REALLY powerful T5 set up. All of the T5's I've seen so far look kind of bland compared to the halide tanks I've seen.

If you are using T5's do you use LED's for shimmer? If so, does it look as good, or better than halides?

I like T5's for the usual reasons, less heat, more lumens per watt, being able to more finely tune the spectrum......and so on. But I really do like the way halides look.

Also, has anyone noticed a difference in coral growth.


rangerD275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 10:52 AM   #2
old salty
Genius
 
old salty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Island of Misfit Toys
Posts: 3,131
I went back to MH's from T5's. The T5's were great; really no complaints about them. Tanks lit with MH's look more realistic due to the shadows and shimmer. It just became a matter of personal preference.


__________________
"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." Thomas Jefferson

Current Tank Info: Out of the marine aquarium hobby
old salty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 11:07 AM   #3
wtafuro
Registered Member
 
wtafuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 20
T-5 vs MH

I'm in the same situation with lighting, pulling what little hair out trying to figure what to go with. I'm with you on the shimmer it really brings out a lot of quality to the tank.

I saw an idea earlier that I think will solve my problem. Use T-5's for the majority of the lighting and run a single MH on a moving track to simulate daylight. Get the shimmer without most of the heat and still keep the good quality lighting intact.

What do you think?


__________________
I never drink water because of the disgusting things that fish do in it. W. C. Fields

150g in the works
45g sump
29gal Quarantine tank

Current Tank Info: Just building new 150Gal Reef
wtafuro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 11:36 AM   #4
BADGUS
Moved On
 
BADGUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chitown
Posts: 2,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by wtafuro View Post

I saw an idea earlier that I think will solve my problem. Use T-5's for the majority of the lighting and run a single MH on a moving track to simulate daylight. Get the shimmer without most of the heat and still keep the good quality lighting intact.

What do you think?
For me this idea is too much trouble,not enough room.

I will be using MH after trying a 6bulb Tek fixture.The look of the MH is so much more natural,makes the tank more enjoyable.T5's did their job,but the tank lacked something.


BADGUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 11:58 AM   #5
wtafuro
Registered Member
 
wtafuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 20
Quote:
For me this idea is too much trouble,not enough room.

I will be using MH after trying a 6bulb Tek fixture.The look of the MH is so much more natural,makes the tank more enjoyable.T5's did their job,but the tank lacked something.
I'm not disagreeing with you on that point. The biggest problem is room. I had planned on going with an 8 bulb T-5 which would leave me very little room on one edge of the tank for an HQI reflector. Tank is 24" wide.

The other thought I had was to go with a strict MH strip like Currents sunpod 3X250w and then add 2 strips of dual 80 watt t-5's. This would give me nore than enough light but also give me the ability to adjust color on the t-5 bulbs as needed.

Any other Ideas?


__________________
I never drink water because of the disgusting things that fish do in it. W. C. Fields

150g in the works
45g sump
29gal Quarantine tank

Current Tank Info: Just building new 150Gal Reef
wtafuro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 12:18 PM   #6
ken6217
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,179
I have two tanks. One has MH and the other has T5 with individual Ice Cap reflectors. The growth on my SPS are excellent in both, and maybe even better in the T5 tank. I do like the look of the MH's though. The brightness and the shimmer looks so nice.

I had heard of people adding LED lights to their T5's to get that shimmer effect. I can't do it unfortunately because I have no room in my canopy.
Ken


ken6217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 02:37 PM   #7
James77
Registered Member
 
James77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 8,158
If you like the look of halides, go with the halides.

I used T5s last year, started with a SolarFlare and ended up getting an ATI Powermodule. While intense and effective, I missed the shimmer of halides. Unless you are already having a problem with heat, halides are more than manageable in a properly vented canopy. The electrical savings are not spectacular. It costs me about $10/month more running 2x250 HQIs with VHO actinics than it did with the 8x54 Powermodule. My biggest reason was the appearance, which is a big plus for halides, especially considering our tanks are usually for show. The T5s had the flat flourescent look of every freshwater tank I have owned.

I do use T5s on my palnted tank, mostly because I wanted that tank to use as little power as possible, and T5s are great for planted tanks.


__________________
Jim

Current Tank Info: 120g Mixed Reef and 75g Freshwater
James77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 07:46 PM   #8
danjen10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 87
I went back from T5 to Halides. I got the Lumenbright mini wide reflectors. I prefer the color and look of the halides. My corals seem happier under them too.


danjen10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 08:55 PM   #9
grigsy
Registered Member
 
grigsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 2,307
I had T5 for a little while, but I always prefered the look of my tank under metal halides. Just love the shimmer effect I get from halides.

Right now, I am using Hamilton Cayman Sun 250 watt HQI reflectors and I really like them.


grigsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 09:00 PM   #10
scottwhitson
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lewiston, Idaho
Posts: 1,395
I also have used both and really prefer the look of halides. You can't beat the shimmer in my opinion. I think the answer to this thread is what YOU really prefer the looks of. I personally like a brighter tank with shimmer. I think that T5's are great lights for the power saving and the heat I just don't like the look.


scottwhitson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 09:03 PM   #11
rangerD275
Registered Member
 
rangerD275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken6217 View Post
I have two tanks. One has MH and the other has T5 with individual Ice Cap reflectors. The growth on my SPS are excellent in both, and maybe even better in the T5 tank. I do like the look of the MH's though. The brightness and the shimmer looks so nice.

I had heard of people adding LED lights to their T5's to get that shimmer effect. I can't do it unfortunately because I have no room in my canopy.
Ken
Yeah, I've heard of people using the LED's (mainly current powerbrites) to get that look, problem is that I would think that if your T5's are powerful enough, they would drown out most LED's that are realistic. Though I cant speak from experience, only an idea.


rangerD275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 09:59 PM   #12
bkcjames
Registered Member
 
bkcjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 118
I switched from 4 6ft vho to 8 36" t5, the whole time I am still running my mh 250 watt 20k's. I love the shimmer effect, no other light can mimic that.


bkcjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 10:05 PM   #13
James77
Registered Member
 
James77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 8,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by rangerD275 View Post
Yeah, I've heard of people using the LED's (mainly current powerbrites) to get that look, problem is that I would think that if your T5's are powerful enough, they would drown out most LED's that are realistic. Though I cant speak from experience, only an idea.
Ive seen a couple videos where it has been tried, and as more T5s come on, most of the shimmer is drowned out. IDK if more shimmer is visible in person or not.


__________________
Jim

Current Tank Info: 120g Mixed Reef and 75g Freshwater
James77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 10:05 PM   #14
jayk198030
Registered Member
 
jayk198030's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tag, your it!
Posts: 783
i have had every type of bulb.

lets see...

PC (power compacts) -stink
t-12- awesome for super atinics
T-8 - a waste
T-5 -pretty good
MH - by far the best
LED - tech not there yet (if so costly)


__________________
I feel like 1.025 and i look like skimmate. I eat crap and throw up! What am I?

Current Tank Info: I need help!!
jayk198030 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2009, 11:30 PM   #15
podcar
Registered Member
 
podcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Suisun City, CA
Posts: 122
I also switched back. Although to be completly fair, my T5s didnt have individual reflectors. The MHs look much better now.


podcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 07:01 AM   #16
pmcadams
Registered Member
 
pmcadams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 126
I'm surprised you would choose one over the other. It's been about 6 years since my last reef, (I'm sure things have changed) but I'm in the process of starting another one now. My previous reefs were VHOs (T12 ?) and MH. They are not the same spectrum, so I assumed both are beneficial and not mutually exclusive. Aren't T5s just another version of T12s ? My plan right now is again for florescent bulbs and MH. Educate me on T5s please.... Thanks


__________________
Paul
pmcadams is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 08:19 AM   #17
rangerD275
Registered Member
 
rangerD275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmcadams View Post
I'm surprised you would choose one over the other. It's been about 6 years since my last reef, (I'm sure things have changed) but I'm in the process of starting another one now. My previous reefs were VHOs (T12 ?) and MH. They are not the same spectrum, so I assumed both are beneficial and not mutually exclusive. Aren't T5s just another version of T12s ? My plan right now is again for florescent bulbs and MH. Educate me on T5s please.... Thanks
I was mainly referring to my "main" growth light source. With advances in reflectors/ bulbs there is a major shift toward using T5 lighting to replace halides with very good results. I would still be using T5 actincs for the dusk/ dawn effect, but I am debating on either using a MH and T5 combo, or just T5's. Also, you can use a 14, or 20K MH w/o actinics if you want but you will only see your fish 6 hours a day.

The problem occurs because florescent's do not emmit from a single light source and do not produce the "shimmer" effect that Halides do. Also penetration is slightly less.

There are many threads debating the merits of each that have some very good info. I dont really want to turn this thread into a T5 vs MH thread because there are too many to count but after looking at all of the data both have their positives and negatives, I just really think it boils down to personal preference.

I started this thread because in the T5 threads there are so many people that say "they will never go back to Halides" and I wanted to see if there was another group that in fact did go back to halides, and why.



Last edited by rangerD275; 12/24/2009 at 08:26 AM.
rangerD275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 08:20 AM   #18
GrampaDon
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fort Wayne ,IN
Posts: 636
I switched back to MH/T5 Personal preference thing I guess. Because the
T5s did a fine job [retro with IC reflectors]


GrampaDon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 08:27 AM   #19
Nereaga
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oley, Pa 19547
Posts: 1,513
Started out with Mh only, then went to a T5 only setup and now running the Outer Orbit Mh/T5 combo. Best of both worlds! Great growth and good color. Not to mention the shimmer and more natural look of the halides....

Brad


Nereaga is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 08:34 AM   #20
arredondojason
Registered Member
 
arredondojason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 988
I went from MH to T5 when I up graded from my 150G tank to my new 240G tank here is a pic of my tank when it had the T5s on it.



and I just didnt like the way it looked so i went back to the MH now I have 3 250W MH with the bulbs are Hamilton 14K.
Sorry the pic is so big I am still trying to figure out how to resize them down.




arredondojason is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 08:47 AM   #21
pmcadams
Registered Member
 
pmcadams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 126
Thanks for the explanation Ranger. You confirmed what I thought.... my plans remain intact


__________________
Paul
pmcadams is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 08:56 AM   #22
Moebuis
Registered Member
 
Moebuis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hampstead, MD
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by arredondojason View Post
Off topic, but what's the air line for?

Back on topic: I've used both MH and T5 separately but now use both. The T5 supplements my MH and allows me to have a longer photoperiod to enjoy my tank while I'm home.


Moebuis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 12:31 PM   #23
rangerD275
Registered Member
 
rangerD275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 167
Thanks everyone for your feedback.


rangerD275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 01:50 PM   #24
tufacody
Registered Member
 
tufacody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,890
I too prefer MH. T5 can definitely pop corals, but for me its at the expenses of a natural looking reef. I just see Las Vegas when I see an all T5 tank. The glow just looks a little too sterile/artificial.


tufacody is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/24/2009, 07:41 PM   #25
Johnny C
Registered Member
 
Johnny C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 4,140
The Current Powerbrite LEDs will definatly add shimmer to a T5-lit aquarium. It's not as intense as the halides, but definatly enough to get your "fix".

Here's two older videos of my tank with the T5s and LEDs on. Mind you this is only two strips and is more intense in real-life.

2 460nm. LEDS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nnYAf2bMn4

All T5s & LEDs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oG6Z...eature=channel


__________________
"...the sea, once it casts its spell, holds one in its net of wonders forever" -Jacques Cousteau
Johnny C is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.