Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 02/10/2010, 11:08 AM   #1
danny1496
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Plantation FL
Posts: 322
SWC 160 cone club..

i just pre ordered the SWC 160 cone and i know there are some more guys in also so i made this post to talk about upgrade and setups,feedback..enjoy


danny1496 is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 11:10 AM   #2
DevilBoy
Registered Member
 
DevilBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wooster, Ohio
Posts: 1,724
i will join the club i pre ordered mine yesterday so we will wait and see how it works. if it does pull 600lph then it should rock.


DevilBoy is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 11:24 AM   #3
angieg1123
Premium Member
 
angieg1123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 525
I preordered mine as well. After 10+ years of strictly Euro-reef and ASM, it will be interresting to see the difference in performance.


angieg1123 is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 11:26 AM   #4
danny1496
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Plantation FL
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilBoy View Post
i will join the club i pre ordered mine yesterday so we will wait and see how it works. if it does pull 600lph then it should rock.
that is the main reason i order mine ..and for the space..9x7


danny1496 is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 11:28 AM   #5
danny1496
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Plantation FL
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by angieg1123 View Post
I preordered mine as well. After 10+ years of strictly Euro-reef and ASM, it will be interresting to see the difference in performance.
yes i will be very intersted to know how it compares to asm and euro..make shore u keep us updated ..
danny


danny1496 is offline  
Unread 02/11/2010, 09:29 PM   #6
cet98
"feed ur reef...feed it!"
 
cet98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: in a van...down by the river
Posts: 3,254
Wink can I join the club?

got mine in early January and I do likely it very much...


Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0106.jpg (50.0 KB, 585 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0071.jpg (41.7 KB, 266 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0073.jpg (35.4 KB, 240 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0075.jpg (41.8 KB, 252 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0078.jpg (41.2 KB, 257 views)
cet98 is offline  
Unread 02/11/2010, 09:33 PM   #7
cet98
"feed ur reef...feed it!"
 
cet98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: in a van...down by the river
Posts: 3,254
here's a couple more pix
I am really impressed with the overall build quality...
nicely polished and just feels like quality IMO


Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0084.jpg (48.9 KB, 177 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0090.jpg (23.7 KB, 139 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0067.jpg (21.7 KB, 133 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0068.jpg (22.1 KB, 161 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0092.jpg (25.0 KB, 128 views)
cet98 is offline  
Unread 02/11/2010, 09:41 PM   #8
cet98
"feed ur reef...feed it!"
 
cet98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: in a van...down by the river
Posts: 3,254
and here's a quick vid...




cet98 is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 08:45 AM   #9
danny1496
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Plantation FL
Posts: 322
cet thanks for the feed back and the video ..how many inches of water is the skimer in..


danny1496 is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 10:22 AM   #10
cet98
"feed ur reef...feed it!"
 
cet98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: in a van...down by the river
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by danny1496 View Post
cet thanks for the feed back and the video ..how many inches of water is the skimer in..
ur welcome my pleasure...
can't wait to hear everyone else's opinions!
kinda stinks being one of the very few right now to have one but.....
that's gonna change real fast!!!

skimmer set up in 7.5" of water...


cet98 is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 10:26 AM   #11
g8gxp
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 685
cet, can you take the bottom apart if you need to clean the pump, or is it sealed in there?


g8gxp is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 10:41 AM   #12
cet98
"feed ur reef...feed it!"
 
cet98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: in a van...down by the river
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by g8gxp View Post
cet, can you take the bottom apart if you need to clean the pump, or is it sealed in there?
You can completely disassemble this skimmer (one of the major reasons I like it so much)
In my pix above you will notice that the bottom plate is actually TWO plates held together with four screws at each corner.

The top plate is attached to the skimmer body

The bottom plate is where the pump's mounting plate is attached to, also using four screws and is knotched to allow for the pumps wiring to pass thru...(see close-up pics in post #6 above)

The pump slides off the mounting plate and the mounting plate can be removed if desired for a thorough cleaning.

FWIW, I had the entire skimmer disassembled in less than 5 minutes...it's just so easy and well thought out IMO.

HTH some...

C


cet98 is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 11:07 AM   #13
lechee12
Registered Member
 
lechee12's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: nyc
Posts: 214
i'll be joining this club too


lechee12 is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 12:51 PM   #14
goreefers
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 134
does it perform and/or build better than BM NAC7? since they using same pump and hving almost the same footprint! thanks


goreefers is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 01:26 PM   #15
cet98
"feed ur reef...feed it!"
 
cet98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: in a van...down by the river
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by goreefers View Post
does it perform and/or build better than BM NAC7? since they using same pump and hving almost the same footprint! thanks
good question...dunno

from my readings, people seem to be extremely happy with their BMs although I have read about the neck transition on the NAC7 having a "step" in it and is not a smooth transition like on the SWC, but since I don't own the BM, I can't comment on that...

Build quality, again since I don't own the BM, I can only attest to the very high quality I have with my SWC.

Performance, once again, based on reports from others the NAC7 pulls approx. 18W at 500lph and the SWC pulls 23W at 600lph...likely due to the differences in volute and BP designs

In the end, at this price point, I'm not so sure there is a clear cut "winner" between these two skimmers. The truth, IMHO, is that so many people think that numbers mean so much, but if you placed these two skimmers side by side, would you "SEE" the difference in performance?...I really don't know
I think it all comes down to preference...and budget

On a personal note, I chose (BEFORE knowing anything about the build quality and performance) the SWC for two reasons over the BM:
1- I personally love the "color scheme" of the SWC over the BMs
2- The CS "before" the sale I received (and continue to receive) from the company & gentleman I purchased it from...

HTH some

C

PS, I'd also like to comment on the water level adjustment...I use to own an Octopus INT-PS150 skimmer with a sliding stand pipe and while I never really had a problem with it, I really like the fine tuning ability of the gate valve on the SWC...not really sure how the BM does it, but I just thought I'd mention that )



Last edited by cet98; 02/12/2010 at 01:36 PM.
cet98 is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 01:26 PM   #16
hammmerhead
Registered Member
 
hammmerhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by goreefers View Post
does it perform and/or build better than BM NAC7? since they using same pump and hving almost the same footprint! thanks
There is really no comparison other than the pump.
NAC:
Not really a cone. Very little taper at all.
Skim cup neck just sticks down into the body with no transition lip. Very poor design.
Tiny bubble plate, which they now know is too small and are offering replacements, but Im sure you have to pay.

Its a no brainer just by comparing the quality of them side by side IMO.




__________________
150 gal. 30 gal sump. 2X400 watt 10k XM's 4X160watt VHO's, SWC 250a skimmer, sps, lps, softies, clams, various fish including a 15 year old maroon clown
hammmerhead is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 06:41 PM   #17
danny1496
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Plantation FL
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammmerhead View Post
There is really no comparison other than the pump.
NAC:
Not really a cone. Very little taper at all.
Skim cup neck just sticks down into the body with no transition lip. Very poor design.
Tiny bubble plate, which they now know is too small and are offering replacements, but Im sure you have to pay.

Its a no brainer just by comparing the quality of them side by side IMO.

thanks for the pictures ...


danny1496 is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 06:43 PM   #18
danny1496
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Plantation FL
Posts: 322
can't wait to get mine.. now i have a coralife super skimer 125g ...so i should be a lots off gunk coming out of my tank..


danny1496 is offline  
Unread 02/12/2010, 08:45 PM   #19
serum153
Registered Member
 
serum153's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reno
Posts: 584
Mine is on pre-order

+1 on teh customer service from the other guy you bought from cet. He has been very very helpful and keeps everyone in the loop. That as well as his stamp of approval was the reason I chose the 160 cone.


serum153 is offline  
Unread 02/13/2010, 12:24 AM   #20
DevilBoy
Registered Member
 
DevilBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wooster, Ohio
Posts: 1,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by cet98 View Post
and here's a quick vid...

how do you fine tune that skimmer?? with the red gate valve knob?


DevilBoy is offline  
Unread 02/13/2010, 07:34 AM   #21
Nino Garcia
Registered Member
 
Nino Garcia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 45
Joining the club, ordered mind on Wednesday from Reef Filtration.


Nino Garcia is offline  
Unread 02/13/2010, 07:44 AM   #22
cet98
"feed ur reef...feed it!"
 
cet98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: in a van...down by the river
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilBoy View Post
how do you fine tune that skimmer?? with the red gate valve knob?
yessir!...


cet98 is offline  
Unread 02/13/2010, 07:47 AM   #23
cet98
"feed ur reef...feed it!"
 
cet98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: in a van...down by the river
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nino Garcia View Post
Joining the club, ordered mind on Wednesday from Reef Filtration.
congrats!....I think you'll be more than pleased with both the skimmer and the CS you'll receive from RF


cet98 is offline  
Unread 02/13/2010, 07:51 AM   #24
skimmy
T3am Zissou
 
skimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 1,123
and to think, I was THIS close to importing a pallet of BM nac7's...lol
(add schreeching breaks sound here)

you can tell just by looking at the 160 cone how sweet of a skimmer it is...

we know the atmann pump performs good(especially considering it's low cost), and when compared to the pumps(resun,otp)that other skimmer companies are using in this price range. it's been used by BM for over 2 years now with little problems, as well as eshopps changing out all their resun pumps for these same atmann pumps because the failure rate is sooo much lower than resun, they have had good success with these for a year now as well.

the actual design of the skimmer is heads and tails above the BM nac7, starting with an increased cone shape, increased area in the BP, boared out holes on BP, larger exit plumbing for slower moving water(less possible bubbles in exit), gate valve for fine adjustment, better venturi, better muffler, better build quality... I'm very excited to order mine for the new tank I'm building.

that being said, I dont think that the nac7 is a bad skimmer per say, I still think it's pretty damn good, and people are having good results with it which is the important thing. now, if it was just cheaper than the 160 cone, then it would have it's place in the world, but it cant go neck to neck with the 160.



Last edited by skimmy; 02/13/2010 at 08:04 AM.
skimmy is offline  
Unread 02/13/2010, 11:12 AM   #25
SeedlessOne
Registered Member
 
SeedlessOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pooler, GA
Posts: 887
How would these do with a 90g sps with a heavy bioload?


SeedlessOne is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.