|
05/19/2010, 08:13 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 243
|
watts per gallon rule
In my local forum, they always say that light should be according to the watts per gallon rule, but i have read that this is not true. Could someone elaborate on this please
|
05/19/2010, 08:20 AM | #2 |
Cyprinius carpio
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,496
|
That is pretty much old school thinking. Now people look at PAR instead of wpg.
I could have a tall tank say 30 inches tall with PC lighting and 25 watts per gallon but it won't mean much if I am trying to keep clams healthy. If I have a PAR reading of 250 on the sand then I know I am good even if my wpg is only 8. |
05/19/2010, 08:26 AM | #3 |
On Yer left!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 18,777
|
Watts/gallon rule is ok for heaters, but not for lighting.
__________________
- Scott |
05/19/2010, 08:46 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 8,158
|
There are far too many variables, especially with T5 and LED, to make such a broad "rule" as watts per gallon. Types of light, temperature of light, quality of reflector, cooling, water depth and clarity, and most impotantly what critters you are keeping all dictate how much lighting you need.
A set of T5's that are just enought to keep SPS/clams could fall far short if they are not cooled. If a tank requires 750 watts of halides, 750 watts of LEDs with optic could scorch everything.
__________________
Jim Current Tank Info: 120g Mixed Reef and 75g Freshwater |
05/19/2010, 08:53 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 243
|
Thanks everyone for the answers, any other information will be welcome also
|
05/19/2010, 12:08 PM | #6 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 887
|
For our purposes, a watt is merely a measurement of how much power a device consumes. It says nothing about how much light is generated.
For example, a typical household 100W incandescent lamp, a 24W compact-fluorescent and a 6W LED all produce roughly the same amount of light, even though they use vastly different amounts of power in order to do so. |
05/19/2010, 01:03 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,689
|
These days the technology in lighting has allowed for manufacturers to produce powerful lighting options that utilize half the watts the old fashioned bulbs used. Unless your talking VHO's, watts per gallon is obsolete.
__________________
Ryan |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do wwe still use the $$$ per Gallon rule?? | Mr James | Reef Discussion | 27 | 10/09/2009 07:01 AM |
18 watts per gallon in a 10 gallon mushroom community | Ryan Heitzman | New to the Hobby | 7 | 06/13/2008 06:35 AM |
Watts per gallon or depth of tank rule? | jimi thing | Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment | 4 | 12/31/2007 02:46 PM |
Watts Per Gallon vs. Watts Per Depth | bbyatv | Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment | 0 | 12/24/2007 12:16 AM |
What Is The Fish Per Litre/gallon rule? | Madoktopus | Reef Discussion | 4 | 03/12/2006 02:31 PM |