![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
aquascaping input
so putting together the 240g. put some newspaper in for ideas and this is what we came up with. anyone see any possible problems with a layout like this or if u think it can be improved in some way let me know.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
p.s. that lady will not be holdin gthe plant there in the final rendition
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 322
|
I think it's a little too high. I like to see clear swimming room in the upper 1/3. Maybe flatten it out and use 2 islands instead of 3 hills.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
i played around with it and agree 2 slopes are better. here they are a tall one and short one also added a sloping one
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Occupy Reef Central
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orbiting
Posts: 4,141
|
Personally, I don't like rock touching any side. I really think the best way is with small amounts of rock. Look at the minimalist thread here, as that is the proper way to aquascape IMO.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like bananas. Current Tank Info: 78"x36"x27" acrylic, 6 Orphek Atlantik V3+ Compacts, MRC Orca Pro II w/washdown, CalcFeeder Pro AC3, Emperor Aquatics 80w UV, 80/20 aluminum stand, Vortech MP60's, Theiling Rollermat, GHL Profilux 3.1T EX, Kessil H380 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
wheres the thread
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,485
|
Right here http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/sh....php?t=1658490 but minimalist aquascaping isn't for everyone either. Your scapes in your second post look okay if you don't care for the minimalist look.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,485
|
Quote:
I also prefer the minimalist look, but I do in everything. All my furnishings, etc are the mid-century modern minimalist vibe, but then again it's not for everyone and nothing wrong with that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
those tanks r nice but def not my taste
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Anyway I think the middle picture is the best, but I would not put the rocks to the edge of the glass. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
part time superhero
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Snowbelt (NE OHIO)
Posts: 5,698
|
IMO, the number 1 mistake people make when aquascaping is to use symmetrical designs, which aren't really interesting to the eye. Natural growth like plants, corals, etc. almost never grow perfectly symmetrical. Although the last pic you have is close, it would still look too "artificial". I would build one side to cover 2/3 of the tank and do a small island on the empty side.
__________________
BS in Marine Bio ('96), First SW tank in 1992. Current Tank(s) 300g SPS with 90g frag tank and 40 anemone tank - decommissioned 46g LPS/Softy Cube 300g FOWLR under construction - decommissioned |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hilton Head Island
Posts: 554
|
i think the second group of pictures and the middle pic is the best one so far, it takes a while to scape and as long as your happy with it, its correct!! Yea +1 you should give that lady a break holding the plant and invest in some cceiling hooks haha
__________________
GO GAMECOCKS!!!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Moved On
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: O.C.
Posts: 169
|
I like the second one the best. As previously mentioned, you might consider not having the rocks right up against the sides as it makes it hard to clean, unless you don't intend on viewing from the sides at all. Generally, less rock is better because it allows more room for corals and for them to grow into the space over time. You might also consider having more caves inside your rock structure to allow better water flow. Your on the right track over all though. Good luck!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Occupy Reef Central
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orbiting
Posts: 4,141
|
Quote:
Of course the OP can do whatever he wants, but there are guidelines to follow that can improve how his tank looks.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like bananas. Current Tank Info: 78"x36"x27" acrylic, 6 Orphek Atlantik V3+ Compacts, MRC Orca Pro II w/washdown, CalcFeeder Pro AC3, Emperor Aquatics 80w UV, 80/20 aluminum stand, Vortech MP60's, Theiling Rollermat, GHL Profilux 3.1T EX, Kessil H380 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
like art everyone see's it different. but i am interested in those guidelines to make my scape look better. the tank is starfire on three sides so maybe i wont block the sides with the rocks. the reason i want two separate islands is i want to put xenia and anemones on one side and other stuff on the other side. its sort of a barrier to prevent them from taking over the tank. im leaning towards the second pic as well, although the slope looks nice too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
NYRC member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Jackson Heights NY
Posts: 349
|
Go with whichever way maximizes flow and you'll probably thank yourself later.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Tipp of the burg
Posts: 745
|
Using newspaper to aquascape
![]() This was my styrofoam scape... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Occupy Reef Central
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orbiting
Posts: 4,141
|
Quote:
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like bananas. Current Tank Info: 78"x36"x27" acrylic, 6 Orphek Atlantik V3+ Compacts, MRC Orca Pro II w/washdown, CalcFeeder Pro AC3, Emperor Aquatics 80w UV, 80/20 aluminum stand, Vortech MP60's, Theiling Rollermat, GHL Profilux 3.1T EX, Kessil H380 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 1,016
|
IMO i think it all depends on what kind of corals you want and how many fish you plan to have.
EX. SPS corals with lots of fish = more rock in sump and minimalist in display LPS or anemoneas and med. fish = higher rock or more dense rocks in display fish only and soft corals = go nuts with your rocks
__________________
2013 Oklahoma Marine Aquarium Society - President An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure Current Tank Info: 75g braceless SPS dominated w/ 50g Frag Tank |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
lps , softies and fish
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
29g aquascape | Cahooligan | Nano Reefs | 13 | 05/06/2010 02:46 PM |
Aquascaping Input? | mander | Reef Discussion | 7 | 06/29/2007 10:13 PM |
Aquascape Input.... | ASaleem91 | Reef Discussion | 4 | 04/05/2007 01:20 PM |
Aquascaping input | oli5 | Reef Discussion | 9 | 02/21/2007 07:38 AM |
Lighting and Aquascape inputs | longreef | Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment | 0 | 07/10/2006 08:07 PM |