Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 09/27/2010, 10:19 AM   #1
greece86
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 77
Is substrate necessary?

Does it make a dramatic difference in H2O quality if no substrate is added in a fish only tank?


greece86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 10:22 AM   #2
jeff@zina.com
Registered Member
 
jeff@zina.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 3,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by greece86 View Post
Does it make a dramatic difference in H2O quality if no substrate is added in a fish only tank?
No.

Jeff


jeff@zina.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 10:25 AM   #3
theatrus
100-mile-commuter
 
theatrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: almost nevada
Posts: 4,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by greece86 View Post
Does it make a dramatic difference in H2O quality if no substrate is added in a fish only tank?
No, as long as you have filter capacity elsewhere. Running substrateless however means you want to have lots of flow, or waste will collect on the bottom and be very obvious.


__________________
Custom electronics purveyor. blueAcro.com

Current Tank Info: 90g SPS+mixed reef (10 yrs): LEDBrick LEDs, 40g custom sump, Ca reactor, chiller, Vortech, lots of custom electronics
theatrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 10:36 AM   #4
TripleT
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,092
It's one more place for bacteria, pods, bristleworms, etc to live. All good for keeping your tank healthy.

Some livestock also benefit from burrowing or finding hollows under rock for shelter.

Will the tank have plenty of rock?


TripleT is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 10:40 AM   #5
agreeive?fish
Registered Member
 
agreeive?fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,803
+1000 to theatrus post

but it will also depend on what fish you have/plan on having because some REQUIRE a substrate to hide/sleep/eat/make a home

edited to add,, Triple T posted while i was typing my reply so add a +1000 to tripple T post as well


agreeive?fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 11:02 AM   #6
lordofthereef
One reef to rule them all
 
lordofthereef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 5,299
Bare bottom vs substrate tanks are a huge topic amongst aquarists. Everyone has their own preference. I think the vast majority of people who end up going with some form of substrate make the choice based purely on aesthetics though. Of course this is not referring to those who go with a deep sand bad.


__________________
"A dog is the only thing on earth that loves you more than you love yourself" ~ Josh Billings
Visit My Home page for current build thread (click my user name and select "Visit LordoftheReef's Homepage" in the drop down menu!
lordofthereef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 11:04 AM   #7
csarkar001
Registered Member
 
csarkar001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: stamford, ct
Posts: 345
its easier to keep a barebottom tank clean. but it just doesnt look as good.


csarkar001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 11:41 AM   #8
crodger
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 50
It is not required at all, and will likely help you to keep it cleaner by not having detrius collect in the substrate


crodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 12:36 PM   #9
Palting
Registered Member
 
Palting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,912
+ 1 to all above. However, I like the look of a substrate, whether I need it or not.


__________________
Anything I post is just an opinion. One of many in this hobby. Believe and follow at your own risk of rapid and complete annihilation of all life in your tank :)

Current Tank Info: Incept 3/2010, 150 RR, 50g sump, 20g fuge, 150w 15K MH x3, T5 actinics x8, moonlight LED x6, 1400gph return, Koralia 1400 x4, 300 g skimmer, 4 tangs, 2 mandarins, 2 perc, 6 line, 3 cardinals, 2 firefish, SPS, LPS, zoas, palys, shrooms, clam
Palting is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/27/2010, 01:18 PM   #10
aleonn
Registered Member
 
aleonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,041
Lots of people do bare bottom nowadays, but I prefer a 1-1.5" sandbed. To me it looks more like a reef when there's sand.


aleonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding New Substrate/Sand?? SaltwaterGal Reef Discussion 0 04/24/2010 10:58 AM
Change of substrate, need help refining my procedure. Lord Magnus New to the Hobby 4 03/06/2010 08:19 PM
Dolomite as a substrate? dgh5 Reef Discussion 0 01/13/2010 07:11 PM
To substrate,or not to substrate ReefWidowed Northern Ohio Reef Keepers 2 02/11/2007 11:27 AM
Substrate or no substrate? andrew.flavell New to the Hobby 5 07/31/2006 05:50 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.