Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 02/10/2011, 11:32 AM   #1
Palting
Registered Member
 
Palting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,912
Do actinics have anything to do with coral growth?

As the title states. Are actinics mostly for our viewing pleasure to get a good color, or do they actually contribute to coral growth and photosynthetic feeding?

Thanks!


__________________
Anything I post is just an opinion. One of many in this hobby. Believe and follow at your own risk of rapid and complete annihilation of all life in your tank :)

Current Tank Info: Incept 3/2010, 150 RR, 50g sump, 20g fuge, 150w 15K MH x3, T5 actinics x8, moonlight LED x6, 1400gph return, Koralia 1400 x4, 300 g skimmer, 4 tangs, 2 mandarins, 2 perc, 6 line, 3 cardinals, 2 firefish, SPS, LPS, zoas, palys, shrooms, clam
Palting is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 11:42 AM   #2
psteeleb
Registered Member
 
psteeleb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 5,249
a couple of years ago I would have said no, but I'm now convinced otherwise

and when you think of it only the blues penetrate the deeper water and a lot of corals do grow in deeper water


__________________
A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner

Current Tank Info: 110g Mixed Reef, LED's & T5's
psteeleb is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 01:17 PM   #3
Palting
Registered Member
 
Palting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,912
Thanks for the reply. I was considering just having the actinics go on together with the MH, to save on usage and maybe prolong bulb life. But, I kinda am leaning the same way as you are. I see my zoas and shrooms stay open after the MH lights go off with only the actinics on. So, they must benefit from it somehow.


__________________
Anything I post is just an opinion. One of many in this hobby. Believe and follow at your own risk of rapid and complete annihilation of all life in your tank :)

Current Tank Info: Incept 3/2010, 150 RR, 50g sump, 20g fuge, 150w 15K MH x3, T5 actinics x8, moonlight LED x6, 1400gph return, Koralia 1400 x4, 300 g skimmer, 4 tangs, 2 mandarins, 2 perc, 6 line, 3 cardinals, 2 firefish, SPS, LPS, zoas, palys, shrooms, clam
Palting is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 02:52 PM   #4
jdyer88
Registered Member
 
jdyer88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 434
any photosynthectic organism uses light from most of the spectrum, except the color that it shows...so say a coral is orange, it is using all the light it gets except orange, which it reflects. They do however use more light from different parts of the spectrum...some plants for instance use mostly red spectrum light but still use a little white, blue, ect.,


jdyer88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 03:15 PM   #5
llewoh05
Daddy
 
llewoh05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fisher
Posts: 744
here is another question to stem from the OP. how often should you change your atinic bulbs?


__________________
need something new. got any ideas?

Current Tank Info: 1x40br w/ 20gal sump & 10gal refug and 1x incomplete custom 65
llewoh05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 03:18 PM   #6
chimmike
oxygen abuser
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Parrish, FL
Posts: 5,089
Blog Entries: 2
well, i guess the thing is, what wavelength of light are they producing? is it something your MH's aren't? I'm sure actinics help in some way, but more or less are for visuals.


__________________
-Mike
Tankless wonder
Geaux Noles!
chimmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 03:47 PM   #7
jdyer88
Registered Member
 
jdyer88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by chimmike View Post
well, i guess the thing is, what wavelength of light are they producing? is it something your MH's aren't? I'm sure actinics help in some way, but more or less are for visuals.
yea exactly...I'm willing to bet they help too, plus they look cool so why not run them


jdyer88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 06:35 PM   #8
Palting
Registered Member
 
Palting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,912
They DO look cool. I'm coming up to the 8th month of these lights, and MH replacement time is coming up according to recommendations. 3 of them. They are NOT cheap!

AFAIK, Mh needs replacing at 8-12 months, T5's at 12-18 months.

There will come a time when all my bulbs will need replacing at the same time. That's 3 MH bulbs at @ $70 per, 8 T5 HO's at @ $25 per (better brands). We are talking @ $410 !!! I am just trying to save money without compromising the tank by seeing if I can use them less.

But, I guess we didn't get into this hobby because it was cheap. Oh, well.


__________________
Anything I post is just an opinion. One of many in this hobby. Believe and follow at your own risk of rapid and complete annihilation of all life in your tank :)

Current Tank Info: Incept 3/2010, 150 RR, 50g sump, 20g fuge, 150w 15K MH x3, T5 actinics x8, moonlight LED x6, 1400gph return, Koralia 1400 x4, 300 g skimmer, 4 tangs, 2 mandarins, 2 perc, 6 line, 3 cardinals, 2 firefish, SPS, LPS, zoas, palys, shrooms, clam
Palting is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 07:55 PM   #9
edsreef
Registered Member
 
edsreef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Palting View Post
They DO look cool. I'm coming up to the 8th month of these lights, and MH replacement time is coming up according to recommendations. 3 of them. They are NOT cheap!

AFAIK, Mh needs replacing at 8-12 months, T5's at 12-18 months.

There will come a time when all my bulbs will need replacing at the same time. That's 3 MH bulbs at @ $70 per, 8 T5 HO's at @ $25 per (better brands). We are talking @ $410 !!! I am just trying to save money without compromising the tank by seeing if I can use them less.

But, I guess we didn't get into this hobby because it was cheap. Oh, well.
It's all adding up to LED time, aint it?


edsreef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 08:13 PM   #10
Mike Ordner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 415
I am no expert on this, but it is my understanding that coral growth has to do with PAR, and true actinics are a lower PAR bulb. So, it will help some but is more for looking at corals.


Mike Ordner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 09:35 PM   #11
pimp4cheddar
Registered Member
 
pimp4cheddar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Orlando, Fl.
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Ordner View Post
I am no expert on this, but it is my understanding that coral growth has to do with PAR, and true actinics are a lower PAR bulb. So, it will help some but is more for looking at corals.
PAR is a measure of how much is in the water at a certain dept...

Actinics do grow coral. Many people only have actinic bulbs in their lighting unit (I for example).

I have a combo of ATI Blue Plus (460nm Actinics), UV Lighting Super Actinic (420nm) and ATI Purple Plus (like the KZ Fiji Purple).

There's no issue in using on actinic's...but it's a well known fact a bulb like the GE 6500k will help help coral grow a lot more (because of the amount of par it puts out and also the color spectrum)...but your tank will look like **** yellow rather than aqua blue - thus the reason people may only put one of those yellow/white bulbs in their T5 unit with 2-3 actinic bulbs... The yellow/white bulb helps with the coral growth and also helps add a nice white balance.


Hope this helps...


pimp4cheddar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 10:34 PM   #12
Palting
Registered Member
 
Palting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by edsreef View Post
It's all adding up to LED time, aint it?
LOL!!! Yes, though these lights did cost me a pretty penny, an all LED fixture probably would have cost me much more initially, but maintenance would be almost zero


__________________
Anything I post is just an opinion. One of many in this hobby. Believe and follow at your own risk of rapid and complete annihilation of all life in your tank :)

Current Tank Info: Incept 3/2010, 150 RR, 50g sump, 20g fuge, 150w 15K MH x3, T5 actinics x8, moonlight LED x6, 1400gph return, Koralia 1400 x4, 300 g skimmer, 4 tangs, 2 mandarins, 2 perc, 6 line, 3 cardinals, 2 firefish, SPS, LPS, zoas, palys, shrooms, clam
Palting is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 10:44 PM   #13
Mike Ordner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 415
Hey Pimp4cheddar, I hear what you are saying. I was thinking of true actinic (420) when I made my reply. Your setup is similar to mine. The blue + is actually pretty high PAR with blue (460) and actinic (420) combined, and the purple + is a full specrum bulb with strong components of red and blue. I have on order a 5 bulb combo with three blue +, one aquablue special and one purple +.


Mike Ordner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2011, 11:37 PM   #14
pimp4cheddar
Registered Member
 
pimp4cheddar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Orlando, Fl.
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Ordner View Post
Hey Pimp4cheddar, I hear what you are saying. I was thinking of true actinic (420) when I made my reply. Your setup is similar to mine. The blue + is actually pretty high PAR with blue (460) and actinic (420) combined, and the purple + is a full specrum bulb with strong components of red and blue. I have on order a 5 bulb combo with three blue +, one aquablue special and one purple +.

I'm with you bro!

I noticed the UVL Super Actinic is actually a very dull bulb (not bright at all...more of a blacklight bulb).

Now the Purple Plus is extremely bright full spectrum bulb (thus the reason I didn't opt for an ATI Aquablue...would have been "too" bright/white).

Any pics of your tank?


pimp4cheddar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2011, 08:03 AM   #15
Mike Ordner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 415
Due to the bad weather, the shipment has been delayed until Monday. I will post of pic when I get the new bulbs in. Fixture is an Aquactinics TX5 with 54 watt bulbs over a standard 75 gallon tank. Light is setting right on top of aquarium.


Mike Ordner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2011, 08:41 AM   #16
chris88
Registered Member
 
chris88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alberta (canada)
Posts: 657
Ofcourse actinics help with coral photosynthesis. Corals use 400nm to about 720nm. which is violet-red. Actinics are 420 which is where coral photosythensis spikes and results in a very high rate of photosynthesis. They do have less overal par but they have a very high pur. I would never run all actinic but they do serve a purpose other then visual asthetics.


chris88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2011, 04:52 PM   #17
Mike Ordner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 415
I found this previous post

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=17772546

jc-reef goes into a lot of detail about PAR and PUR and what light corals utilize.


Mike Ordner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2011, 05:06 PM   #18
Palting
Registered Member
 
Palting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,912
Thanks, guys. Learned a lot. And thanks for the link.


__________________
Anything I post is just an opinion. One of many in this hobby. Believe and follow at your own risk of rapid and complete annihilation of all life in your tank :)

Current Tank Info: Incept 3/2010, 150 RR, 50g sump, 20g fuge, 150w 15K MH x3, T5 actinics x8, moonlight LED x6, 1400gph return, Koralia 1400 x4, 300 g skimmer, 4 tangs, 2 mandarins, 2 perc, 6 line, 3 cardinals, 2 firefish, SPS, LPS, zoas, palys, shrooms, clam
Palting is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What form of PHOSPHATE control do you use for the best SPS and Coralline growth? CleveYank Reef Discussion 37 10/20/2010 02:23 PM
New Tank, but low PH cant get it up, and no coralline growth yet alleny87 New to the Hobby 9 07/31/2010 07:24 AM
Pure actinics affect coral growth significantly? hyperfocal Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment 1 02/10/2008 09:28 AM
Do actinics T5s do anything for coral growth? What do they do? snaza New to the Hobby 4 01/29/2008 03:39 PM
actinic promote coral growth? ultra spikey Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment 1 09/12/2007 01:15 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.