|
10/03/2011, 11:38 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
RO/DI System
i just purchased a 7 stage ro/di system dual membrane system, with booster pump. i get roughly 80-85 psi with the pump and my water waste to good is 1:1. i was wondering what will happen if i add another membrane??? will i have more good water being produced compared to waste? will i have like
.5 gallon waste to 1 gallon good?? |
10/03/2011, 11:46 PM | #2 |
Registered Member.
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,677
|
80-85 PSI is usually a little much...dontcha' think?
|
10/04/2011, 12:19 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
not really considering when running dual membrane its required to have a minimum of 65psi to be most efficient. im avg 80, some reviews customers stated getting 90 psi with their pumps. as long as u have the 1:1 ratio and your not over 90 your good. im just trying to find out what if i add another membrane how will i benefit, if i benefit at all?
|
10/04/2011, 12:49 AM | #4 |
Moved On
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cavitation Bubble
Posts: 776
|
Only real benefit, as far as I can think of atm, would be less frequent DI resin changes
|
10/04/2011, 12:56 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
I'm willing to do 3 membranes just to save water but I gotta be sure its Gunna work.
|
10/04/2011, 05:13 AM | #6 |
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
First - remember that what folks call "waste water" really would be better thought of as "flush water" in that this water serves the important purpose of internally flushing the surface of the semipermeable membrane to keep the membrane from fouling/scaling.
When you configure a system with two membranes in series (the waste from the first membrane going to the "in" port on the second membrane), for this discussion let's say it's two 75 gpd membranes, the system behaves like you have a single long (75 gpd x 2) 150 gpd membrane. Now - if you use a proper flow restrictor, that is, one for a 150 gpd membrane, you'll have about a 4:1 waste to product ratio. Sounds familiar, right? If however you don't change the flow restrictor - meaning you keep using the same restrictor you were using when you just had one 75 gpd membrane, then you'll see a waste to product ratio much lower than 4:1. But remember that the recommendation for a ~4:1 ratio comes from the membrane manufacturer. They are telling you that you need about a 4:1 ratio to keep the membrane flushed and keep the membrane from fouling or building up scale. Run the system with a lower ratio and you will foul/scale the membrane(s) quicker than would have otherwise been the case. Instead of adding a second membrane to lower that ratio, you could have just changed out your flow restrictor ($4) instead. A much less expensive approach to get you to the same endpoint in terms of saving on waste water. Now, to confuse things just a bit. Filmtec specs call for the 4 to 1 ratio on the basis of assumptions about the water that will be supplied to the membrane. If you have very soft water you MAY be able to get a decent service life from the membrane running at a ratio lower than 4 to 1 (e.g., 3 to 1). Remember that the waste water from the first membrane is about 25% harder than your tap water. Bottom line: If what you are after is reduced waste water, experiment with a different flow restrictor for $4 instead of messing around with a second membrane plumbed in series. As a side note, you can also lower the ratio by increasing the pressure delivered to the membrane (with a booster pump), because flow restrictors are sized assuming you are providing factory spec conditions (50 psi and 77 degrees for Filmtec membranes). Increase the pressure and you'll drive more water through the membrane and viola - less waste water. But as I mentioned above, if you do this (just like over-restricting a membrane) - the lower the waste to product ratio, the shorter the lifespan on the membrane. Makes sense? Russ |
10/07/2011, 11:41 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
damn russ u broke it down lol, thanks man. where can i purchase flow restrictors?? is the restrictor the small plastic piece that sits inside the waste line coming out of the membrane?
|
10/07/2011, 11:48 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
i found this stuff...
vhttp://www.spectrapure.com/St_replac_p3.htm now i just get a flow restrictor thats lower than 75gpd correct? for example i would replace the one i have now sitting in my single membrane that has a 3:1 ratio 75gpd with the (FR-40) in the link so it makes it 40gpd? = more restriction? also i do have a booster motor on order, should put me up to 90psi. since i already ordered my 2nd membrane can i still add the flow restrictor ex: FR-40 and maybe get better than 1:1. maybe .5:1 |
10/08/2011, 05:16 AM | #9 |
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
|
10/08/2011, 05:18 AM | #10 |
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
|
10/08/2011, 05:24 AM | #11 | ||
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10/08/2011, 05:57 AM | #12 |
Team RC member
|
But he is an excellent supplier of all equipment associated with RO/DI.
__________________
Warmest regards, ~Steve~ |
10/08/2011, 07:31 PM | #13 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
Quote:
also i wanted to post a quick pic of my set up, dont mind the garage its terrible lol. |
|
10/08/2011, 09:09 PM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 638
|
No, I get 120psi on two 100 gpd membranes with 350 gpd.
__________________
Genesis 2:28 God blessed them and said to them,"Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground." Current Tank Info: 275 starphire, 3 x 400 watt MH + 4 x 80 watt T5's, 2 x MP 60 + 2 x MP 40, Orca 250 skimmer, CADS filter head (SeaVisions), ProCal Ca reactor, GHL controlled. |
10/08/2011, 09:21 PM | #15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
hot damn lol is that a 3/4 hp motor???? that thing is a monster.
i meant over 90 for the 8800 motor, but for yours i dont know 120 psi man u must have good water production? what is your ratio with that dual membrane? |
10/08/2011, 10:04 PM | #16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 196
|
Since y'all are posting pictures of your RO systems, here's mine at work. 20,000 gallons per day of 800 k-ohm-cm permeate, 5 and 7 HP pumps, 30 Filmtec BW30-4040 membranes, 80% recovery ratio, net driving pressure of 160 psi in the first pass and 210 psi in the second pass.
Yeah, I know, I'm evil. Just couldn't resist. :-)
__________________
Tim @ home, 90 gallon tank, dry, waiting for the remodelling to be over @ work, 19,000 gallon per day RO, Electrodeionization, Vacuum Degas, 90 cubic feet DI resin - I love my job! Current Tank Info: dry, kind of dusty :-( Last edited by PurdueWaterGuy; 10/08/2011 at 10:15 PM. Reason: Can't link to photo |
10/08/2011, 10:22 PM | #17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
lmao jesus.
have a question for you guys what maintenance is needed before and after use of my ro/di unit??? also when should i flush after certain gallons produced? or by time table? monthly weekly? |
10/09/2011, 05:00 AM | #18 |
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
|
10/09/2011, 11:51 AM | #19 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 196
|
+1 on moving the pump to after the clear polycarbonate filter cannister. Not pretty when they fail. Been there, seen that, had to clean up after others. :-(
Noticed that your pump doesn not have the built-in pressure relief valve, watch your pressures. Check the pressure ratings on all the components, plan for the worst, hope for the best.
__________________
Tim @ home, 90 gallon tank, dry, waiting for the remodelling to be over @ work, 19,000 gallon per day RO, Electrodeionization, Vacuum Degas, 90 cubic feet DI resin - I love my job! Current Tank Info: dry, kind of dusty :-( Last edited by PurdueWaterGuy; 10/09/2011 at 11:54 AM. Reason: addded comment |
10/09/2011, 11:57 AM | #20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 343
|
+++2
|
10/09/2011, 12:01 PM | #21 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
__________________
225 starfire in wall glass box stick dominated....(400gal TWV) RIP 4x2x2 sps dominated reef |
|
10/09/2011, 12:20 PM | #22 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 196
|
Running the 460 VAC 3-phase for the pumps into your house might be a bit of a problem ;-)
__________________
Tim @ home, 90 gallon tank, dry, waiting for the remodelling to be over @ work, 19,000 gallon per day RO, Electrodeionization, Vacuum Degas, 90 cubic feet DI resin - I love my job! Current Tank Info: dry, kind of dusty :-( |
10/09/2011, 12:34 PM | #23 | |
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
Quote:
It's the clear housings. If you have any chips, scratches, etc, in those housings, their ability to handle pressure is even lower. Russ |
|
10/09/2011, 01:01 PM | #24 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 196
|
All this talk of failing filter cannisters conjured up a flashback - once upon a time I came into work to find my ion implanter (sort of a giant mass spectrometer mated to a particle accelerator) shut down. The 20" tall DI cannister had gotten dirty and was restriciting flow, and the positive displacement pump (made by Procon, like the one in your picture) kept on pushing, until it split the cannister in two, leaving a ring with the top threaded part attached to the machine, and bounching the bottom half and IX cartridge across the lab.
Ahh, the bad old days.... :-)
__________________
Tim @ home, 90 gallon tank, dry, waiting for the remodelling to be over @ work, 19,000 gallon per day RO, Electrodeionization, Vacuum Degas, 90 cubic feet DI resin - I love my job! Current Tank Info: dry, kind of dusty :-( |
10/09/2011, 01:30 PM | #25 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 638
|
Quote:
__________________
Genesis 2:28 God blessed them and said to them,"Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground." Current Tank Info: 275 starphire, 3 x 400 watt MH + 4 x 80 watt T5's, 2 x MP 60 + 2 x MP 40, Orca 250 skimmer, CADS filter head (SeaVisions), ProCal Ca reactor, GHL controlled. Last edited by Plato; 10/09/2011 at 01:35 PM. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BRS RO/DI vs The Filter Guys vs Filter Direct???? | Bigjav | Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment | 56 | 01/21/2012 11:04 AM |
RO/DI System | Jason265 | New to the Hobby | 9 | 09/11/2011 05:01 PM |
Smallest RO/DI System | fishyman12 | Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment | 7 | 06/05/2011 10:25 AM |
Zeolite in RO/DI system for Chloramine/Ammonia Removal | RalphEWJ | The Reef Chemistry Forum | 82 | 07/14/2010 05:37 PM |