|
08/24/2012, 09:31 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 94
|
changed my mind....again
hey everyone
a long time ago i told all of you my plan of getting a 210 gallon fowlr......then what fish to get.....then wether i should get a reef instead......ect well the tables have turnned again (if only they would stop) and i think this is a good plan now im thinking of staarting out with a 55-60 gallon reef with clowns corals crabs dwarf angles and all the good colorfull stuff althought i just fininished the stand for a 210 gallon aquarium i am thinking of selling it just because i dont think ill need it anymore (thinking of going bigger ) after a year or 2 i think ill go with 260 gallon shark and ray tank with some other semi aggresive fish (MY DRREAM TANK!!) i just think because the rest of the family wants a colorfull living reef ill start out with that, plus ill get some experince with mantaining a saltwater tank before moving bigger hopefully this plan will stay final |
08/24/2012, 10:03 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,705
|
Have you kept even ONE tank yet...with anything in it?
I think starting with a 55-60 range is a great idea. It will only cost a small fortune instead of your entire life savings. Dwarf angels won't work in a reef, they will devour your corals. Trust those of us who thought just one pretty little angel surely wouldn't do much harm!
__________________
Steve Current Tank Info: 58 Oceanic/20g Sump/250w XM 20k/2x39w T5 True Actinic 03/2010 Reef Octopus NW Cone Skimmer |
08/24/2012, 10:35 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 535
|
My Coral Beauty Angle doesn't touch my corals at all... I've had him for over a year now.
|
08/24/2012, 12:29 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 83
|
centropyges are hit or miss- the genicanthus are a safer bet
|
08/24/2012, 01:04 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 171
|
|
08/24/2012, 01:34 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 182
|
Personally I would start with a 75g or a 90g. It's not specifically the gallons, but the width you gain in the stand. With a 18in wide stand you'll have a lot more flexibility in what type of sump you can fit in the stand. I think it'll be much better.
Also, if you can afford it, buy a Reef Ready tank. It'll make your life so much easier! You won't loose sleep worrying about loosing siphon in the event of a power outage.
__________________
Here goes nothin! Current tank info: 90g mixed reef w/ refugium, macro algae, 40lbs LS, 85lbs LR. Total water volume ~105gal. 4xT5 with 90W LED supplement. Reef Octo NWB150. 3,500+ GPH flow. |
08/28/2012, 08:12 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 94
|
thanks for the input
and yes ive owned about 10 freshwater tanks 10-55 gallon range (and a turtle if it counts) also would a flame angle hurt corals? also ill try to get some width on the stand |
08/28/2012, 09:17 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 135
|
I've had horrible luck with flame angels and coral. +1 with the 75 or 90g the extra width makes rock work so much easier over a 55.
__________________
Reef Tanks: 29g, 55g, 58g FOWLR Tanks: 240g, 125g (In Progress) |
08/28/2012, 09:42 PM | #9 | |
Cloning Around
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Valencia, California
Posts: 25,267
|
Quote:
Carry on... Kevin
__________________
Back in the pool, swimming with the sharks... Current Tank Info: Red Sea 425XL w/Kessil AP700, Vertex 180i Skimmer, 2 x Vortech MP40s |
|
08/29/2012, 08:56 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 94
|
|
08/29/2012, 08:58 PM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 94
|
which corals are flames most prone to nip at
|
|
|