Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 10/30/2012, 10:30 AM   #1
rzrmaster
Registered Member.
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MO
Posts: 77
Return Pump for 180 gallon

Im trying to set back up my 180 gallon reef tank. This time I wont be using a canister filter! Good bye fluval! Just drilled and installed a Dart glass hole overflow kit. I had schplitter custom make me a sump/refugium combo years ago that I will now just get around to using hopefully.

Ive been doing ALOT of reading and keep going back and forth on what return pump to use. It seems like I keep getting conflicting info. Some people say more GPH than others. Ive been looking at the Sicce line of pumps. The syncra 5.0 is rated at a little over 1300 gph but after head loss its looking like I would only be getting around 1000 gph. It looks like the next step up is going to be syncra 10 which after head loss is going to be around 2000 gph.

This isnt going to be my main source of water movement so Im wondering what return pump to go with. Is there a better pump than the sicce for the money? I want to get my plumbing setup so I have the proper filtration to house a nicely stocked reef tank.


rzrmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 10:38 AM   #2
Brien H
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 12
I just moved from my 90g to a 180g and in the process was researching return pumps. I ended up going with a Water Blaster and am very happy. Since I am feeding 2 returns, an under stand fuge and a remote fuge in the room behind the tank, I went with the larger HY 10,000 (2,600gph). I'm currently not feeding the remote fuge so I have it throttled back a bit right now and it's pretty silent. With the Herbie overflows I have to touch the plumbing to even tell it's running. Just a vibration to let me know it's running. My skimmer is louder than the return pump.

You may want to check into Water Blasters as another option as they have a 1,300 gph and 1,800 gph models as well.


Brien H is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 11:21 AM   #3
Cleancoupe
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 126
I just put a sicce 5.0 on my 175 & I like it


Cleancoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 11:25 AM   #4
usmc121581
Where am I?
 
usmc121581's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Abingdon, maryland
Posts: 1,671
Blog Entries: 1
I have been running a MAG 18 this is going on 4 years.


__________________
I prefer not to think before I speak, I like to be just as surprised as
everyone else by what comes out of my mouth.

Current Tank Info: I have a 180 gal mostly LPS corals, it contains 1 Val. Tang, 1 yellow striped clown fish, 3 percula clownfish, a blood shrimp, cleaner shrimp and a sand shifting goby, 5 pajama cardinals, 1 green chromis. Also a 75 gal. sump/fug.
usmc121581 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 11:42 AM   #5
gone fishin
Registered Member
 
gone fishin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wyocena Wi
Posts: 6,936
I am using a reeflo dart/snapper hybrid. I ended up swapping to the snapper impellor. the dart impellor was to much flow for my set up.


__________________
Tony

Current Tank Info: 180gal DT, BM NAC77 skimmer,3 Maxspect razors, Maxspect Gyre 150, 30g QT
gone fishin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 11:59 AM   #6
zakstrong
Registered Member
 
zakstrong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 357
my thought on return pumps is as follows. your skimmer heater and everything else in the sump can only process a couple hundred gallons per hour to begin with. so having 2000 gallons running through you sump will not give an increase in skimmer performance or improved heater efficiency. It will give you increased flow in the display which is good and a hell of a lot of noise both from the pump and the water falling noise via the overflow. So in my tanks i always go with a minimal return pump. I have a 210 display with a 65 gallon refuge, 40 gal sump and 20 gal frag tank. all fed with a small external pump. about 450 gallon per hour i assume thought the display. Use internal powerheads in the the display for flow. more efficient with electricity, noise and more adjustable positioning.


zakstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 12:09 PM   #7
tntneon
SPSahollic
 
tntneon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: terneuzen , netherlands
Posts: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by zakstrong View Post
my thought on return pumps is as follows. your skimmer heater and everything else in the sump can only process a couple hundred gallons per hour to begin with. so having 2000 gallons running through you sump will not give an increase in skimmer performance or improved heater efficiency. It will give you increased flow in the display which is good and a hell of a lot of noise both from the pump and the water falling noise via the overflow. So in my tanks i always go with a minimal return pump. I have a 210 display with a 65 gallon refuge, 40 gal sump and 20 gal frag tank. all fed with a small external pump. about 450 gallon per hour i assume thought the display. Use internal powerheads in the the display for flow. more efficient with electricity, noise and more adjustable positioning.
-yes you need to adjust your flow in function of your skimmerflow , if your skimmer draws 1000 gph water flow you need to adjust your return pump accordingly .
But then you still will need an 1500 gph pump as you have to pump the flow up to the display ( say 2~3 ft) , will decrease flow in function of the pump flow charateristic and also it's handy to have some sort of recycle line feeding back into the sump , alowing to fine tune the flow going to DT.
I would take an 2000~2500 gph pump IMO .

greetingzz tntneon


__________________
May the flow be with you !

Current Tank Info: 154 G SPS dominated + 25 G sump ; lighting : 210 W LED XPG/XRE (sunrise) + 150 W T5 (bl+ , 15°K , fiji , bl+) ; skimmer : Royal Exclusive supermarine 200 ; BM 3-Ch dosing pump (CA/ ALk and top-off) ; tunze 6085 circulation
tntneon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 02:06 PM   #8
cap032
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 611
Like Zak, I run minimal flow through my sump. My newly set up 125, is using the Sicce Syncra 3.0. I dialed it about half way back with the built in flow adjuster and its a great pump. Its quiet and reducing my flow this way from the Mag 9.5 I initially put in the sump to the dialed back Sicce Syncra, greatly reduced sump noise, pump noise, and splashing. You would probably be fine with the 3.0 as well, again I have mine dialed back half way.


cap032 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 02:07 PM   #9
wildman926
Registered Member
 
wildman926's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CTX
Posts: 2,904
Your skimmer will skim whaterver it is designed to. The flow through the sump is irrelevent. If the skimmer does not skim it on the first pass, higher flow through the sump ensures it will get it on the next passes.

The theory of slowing your flow in the sump to match your skimmer is only valid if you are directly feeding the skimmer from your overflow, and nothing else.


__________________
Beware of recommendations by those who don't actually use their recommendation!!

The search function actually works quite well!!

Tanks:Planet Aquarium 150g LPS, Planet Aquarium 90g Softie
wildman926 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/30/2012, 09:05 PM   #10
cap032
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 611
Wildman, you are correct, but isnt it true that there is no "real need" to have more flow through the sump than the skimmer can process anyway? Unless of coarse you are counting on the return pump creating the flow in the DT as opposed to powerheads. In essence, slowing the flow may not be an advantage in terms of skimmer performance but, it will save $$$ by running a smaller return pump and greatly reduce noise. Then there is also the extra measure of safety in avoiding potential water on the floor scenarios for those who have 1" or smaller bulkheads.


cap032 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.