|
11/16/2012, 12:15 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fragstaff, AZ
Posts: 341
|
Which Skimmer? Tunze or SRO?
So I can get a Tunze 9415 for the same price as Super Reef Oct 3000
180 gal mixed reef, will have SPS. Total vol. 220 gal. Tunze numbers 15 Watts 63 % less than SRO Air draw: 850 l/h 224 Gal/h 23% less than SRO Water 1100 l/h 290 Gal/h 32% less than SRO SRO 3000 40w Air draw: 1100 L/H (39 SCFH)* GPH: 425* A little less processing capacity on the Tunze, way less watts used. SRO's awsome skimmer reputation vs. Tunze quality Please let me know what you think and which way you'd go? |
11/16/2012, 01:39 AM | #2 |
arrogant reefer
Join Date: May 2012
Location: N Texas
Posts: 687
|
25 watts in 220 gallons is not relevant. 3 years warrenty with the SRO. You choose
|
11/16/2012, 10:19 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 284
|
Do you feel the quality on the Sro isn't as good as the tunze?
|
11/16/2012, 02:05 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fragstaff, AZ
Posts: 341
|
No, if anything I'm going to have to give the german Tunze the edge in quality.. Tunze has great cust. service too, SRO 3 year warranty is a big deal.
I like the possibility of the SRO silicon nitride making calcium build up less of an issue. The Tunze used to have titanium shaft, now its ceramic.. |
11/16/2012, 04:15 PM | #5 |
Moved On
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5
|
I absolutely love both of my SRO skimmers. Some of the most efficient and effective skimmers around!
|
11/16/2012, 04:35 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: LI,NY
Posts: 3,877
|
I switched out my Sedra pump to a Tunze silence pump on my ASM G3 and the skimmer works better than ever. I wish I had the Tunze skimmer body as well. Mine is on a 125 and I use the smaller Tunze silence, the larger one will do a 200+ tank IMO.
|
11/16/2012, 07:15 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 38
|
Never had a tunze skimmer but my SRO 2000 works great on my 75 gallon tank.
SUP |
11/16/2012, 08:47 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 284
|
I use a 3000 ext on my 180 display, 300 gallon total water. I only have fish in the 180. The skimmer works great! Produces some disgusting sludge in a matter of days. The customer service is awesome. The skimmer is built pretty solid. I felt it was almost as solid as my old alpha skimmer. Ive never dealt with tunze skimmers. Seems like a lot more folks run the octopus skimmers. Maybe due to cost or performance?
|
11/16/2012, 08:49 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 284
|
About a month after i bought the skimmer the pump was very loud! Customer service asked my a few questions and sent me a replacement. Its been awesome ever since.
|
11/16/2012, 09:07 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 8,158
|
Customer service with either company will never be a problem. It is hard to beat the 3 year full warranty on the bublle blaster pumps. I have no experience with Tunze skimmers, they are very good from what I have gathered. I use the SRO 2000 and love it enough that I bough the SRO1000 for my 75 gallon soon to be set up anemone tank, if I ever get my butt into gear.
__________________
Jim Current Tank Info: 120g Mixed Reef and 75g Freshwater |
11/17/2012, 12:30 AM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fragstaff, AZ
Posts: 341
|
Thanks for all the input, when you remove the extra $$ for the Tunze it was a very tight race.. but even with equal prices, SRO 3000 it is! The consistency of excellent reviews is overwhelming.
|
11/17/2012, 01:24 AM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: potomac, md
Posts: 49
|
Excellent choice!
|
11/17/2012, 02:26 AM | #13 |
The Fifth Master
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,813
|
Youll love it! I love mine
__________________
Kevin I have lost all concept of reality and live in an SPS world now. |
11/17/2012, 12:30 PM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fruit Cove, FL
Posts: 617
|
SRO all the way, love mine.
__________________
The Dude abides. I don't know about you but I take comfort in that. It's good knowin' he's out there. The Dude. Takin' 'er easy for all us sinners. Current Tank Info: AGA 180g mixed reef, 60" Sunpower 8 bulb, SRO-3000int |
11/17/2012, 02:24 PM | #15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,183
|
This is no contest. The sro is a lot better skimmer.
|
11/17/2012, 04:11 PM | #16 |
Moved on to my couch
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: se michigan
Posts: 1,065
|
I use an SRO 3000 ext on my 180. Best skimmer I've owned.
__________________
Go big or go home!!!! Current Tank Info: Just loungin |
12/06/2012, 12:19 AM | #17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fragstaff, AZ
Posts: 341
|
Got the SRO going tonight, after seeing the Tunze, Karsseboom is right, this is not a contest. The Tunze is a toy, the SRO is a utility beast. I have to admit, I did not ever actually run the Tunze before returning it. BUT, the anti overflow doohicky ate seriously into the volume that should have been used for the reaction chamber.. Bottom line, I felt a lot better about the chances for success of my future reef when I pulled the SRO out of the box. Simple, solid, effective.. Also, glad I took multiple tips not to oversize, the 5000 would have been too much for a my normally stocked 180.
|
12/06/2012, 07:51 AM | #18 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CTX
Posts: 2,904
|
Quote:
__________________
Beware of recommendations by those who don't actually use their recommendation!! The search function actually works quite well!! Tanks:Planet Aquarium 150g LPS, Planet Aquarium 90g Softie |
|
12/07/2012, 11:01 AM | #19 | |
RC Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 492
|
Quote:
The anti-overflow system is one such ease-of-use feature. By preventing the skimmer from foaming over when additives change surface tension, such as when feeding or using epoxy in the tank, this feature makes the skimmer more hassle free. Is it a necessary feature? No, it's a feature of convenience. But it comes at absolutely no cost to the skimmer's performance or efficiency. We can't stress that enough. These days there is no shortage of very effective protein skimmers on the market. Cones, bubble plates, DC motors- the array of choices (and doohickies) is large. We at Tunze hope that every aquarist can choose whichever protein skimmer best meets their needs. At the same time, we want all aquarists to be as well informed as possible when making their choices. Gimmicks and trends come and go; in the end it are the educated hobbyists that discover which are important and, in doing so, they also decide the direction of the industry and of the hobby. |
|
12/12/2012, 02:12 PM | #20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fragstaff, AZ
Posts: 341
|
Well, I'm new to a good sump system (beananimal siphon etc.) and its great, but the potential for overflow is a real problem and not just when getting the tank started. If a return pump shuts down the sump level will rise and likely overflow.., or scenario #2 something dies or causes increase in surficants. These could both be really bad for the tank. So I commend Tunze for being one of the first to figure out a way to eliminate this common problem. It also makes a lot of sense that the reaction chambers are sized by the pump and simply boosting that chamber wouldn't accomplish much without a proportional bump up in pump/watts.. If anyone has actually used a Tunze 9415, (especially on a 150 to 200 gal) please let us know how its doing for you! I think I'm going to have to wire up a float switch to the collection cup to the controller to kill the skimmer's power if it overflows..
|
12/12/2012, 07:58 PM | #21 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CTX
Posts: 2,904
|
Quote:
__________________
Beware of recommendations by those who don't actually use their recommendation!! The search function actually works quite well!! Tanks:Planet Aquarium 150g LPS, Planet Aquarium 90g Softie |
|
|
|