Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 10/24/2016, 12:52 PM   #1
earwicker7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 150
UV flow rate question

I've got a Pentair Aquatics 50W High Output Sterilizer in my build, and have a question about the flow rate.

The manufacturer suggests between 260-330 gallons per hour for parasites, and 1560-1980 gallons per hour for algae and bacteria. I have an in-line flow meter, and the pump I have can only get it up to around 1300 gallons per hour.

My plan is to have it set for algae and bacteria unless there is a parasite outbreak of some sort. Yes, I know this won't completely remove parasites, etc., etc., and I have a quarantine tank set up. I asked the builder if I could get a larger pump so that I can get it in the target zone for bacteria, and he says that it's not necessary.

What, if any, negative effects will result from running it at lower than recommended flow rates?


earwicker7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 01:41 PM   #2
HippieSmell
Occupy Reef Central
 
HippieSmell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orbiting
Posts: 4,141
Unless your tank is the size of a Koi pond, you'll have no issues. It's best to keep it at a low flow rate anyway, IMO.


__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like bananas.

Current Tank Info: 78"x36"x27" acrylic, 6 Orphek Atlantik V3+ Compacts, MRC Orca Pro II w/washdown, CalcFeeder Pro AC3, Emperor Aquatics 80w UV, 80/20 aluminum stand, Vortech MP60's, Theiling Rollermat, GHL Profilux 3.1T EX, Kessil H380
HippieSmell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 02:12 PM   #3
ScuderiaDavis
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 56
I've got a 90 gallon with a Aqua UV sterilizer and my flow rate is about 300 gph.

Tank is in tip top shape!


ScuderiaDavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 02:34 PM   #4
earwicker7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 150
I wonder if the flow rates have to do with what it doesn't sterilize as opposed to what it does? Algae and bacteria are single cell organisms... perhaps at lower flow rates, it starts to sterilize things which might be beneficial?

This is all theoretical... I just have to think the manufacturer had some reason for listing those values.


earwicker7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 04:03 PM   #5
ScuderiaDavis
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 56
That's exactly the reason. My LFS sold me the unit and advised me to not get a higher wattage unit because if it's too much, it does start to kill the beneficial bacteria, etc.


ScuderiaDavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 06:08 PM   #6
slief
RC Sponsor

 
slief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,173
The flow rate impacts contact time. Contact time is what kills or sterilzes what passes through the UV filter. The slower the flow, they high the kill factor. A UV should be sized based on tank size and flow. If you can't reduce your flow enough, a larger UV may be a better choice depending on the goal of the UV. That said, going oversized on a UV Sterilzer is a waste of wattage. In most cases, the same can be accomplished with a properly sized UV fed by a properly sized or gated down pump. And yes, at lower flow rates, you will start to reduce plantonic life which can be counterproductive in the case of a reef if the populations can't reproduce fast enough. I've been running UV's on my systems for decades. Unlike Emperor Aquatics/Pentair, AquaUV has appropriate flow rates for marine and reef aquariums listed for their sterilzers. EA lists flow rates down to 180,000 µw/cm2 which is WAY too low for a reef tank. Even 90,000 µw/cm2 is border line unless the goal is to target parasites in a reef however 90,000 µw will impact planktonic life as well. I usually shoot for around 60,000 µw/cm2 which will keep the water nice and clear while also eliminating bacterial blooms and controlling waterborn algae.

FWIW.. The suggestion of 260-300 GPH for a 50 watt sterilzer is insane. That is 180,000 µw/cm2 + and will kill anything that passes through it including plankton, copepods etc. Very poor advice from the mfg and clearly they don't know what they are suggesting. This has been the case since they bought out EA and one of the many reasons why I would never recommend their products anymore. I wouldn't run less that 600GPH through that thing on a reef. If it's a fish only system, that's a different story. If you want good advice, go with AquaUV in the future. They know what they are doing and will provide sound advice with regards to their products in our applications.


__________________
Director Customer Support Royal Exclusiv USA
For All Royal Exclusiv & Bubble King questions please refer to our Sponsor forum: http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/fo...play.php?f=745

Current Tank Info: 480G display mixed reef, 90G sump, 90G refugium, 60G display refugium. Check out my build thread: http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1783476

Last edited by slief; 10/24/2016 at 06:13 PM.
slief is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 06:39 PM   #7
earwicker7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by slief View Post
The flow rate impacts contact time. Contact time is what kills or sterilzes what passes through the UV filter. The slower the flow, they high the kill factor. A UV should be sized based on tank size and flow. If you can't reduce your flow enough, a larger UV may be a better choice depending on the goal of the UV. That said, going oversized on a UV Sterilzer is a waste of wattage. In most cases, the same can be accomplished with a properly sized UV fed by a properly sized or gated down pump. And yes, at lower flow rates, you will start to reduce plantonic life which can be counterproductive in the case of a reef if the populations can't reproduce fast enough. I've been running UV's on my systems for decades. Unlike Emperor Aquatics/Pentair, AquaUV has appropriate flow rates for marine and reef aquariums listed for their sterilzers. EA lists flow rates down to 180,000 µw/cm2 which is WAY too low for a reef tank. Even 90,000 µw/cm2 is border line unless the goal is to target parasites in a reef however 90,000 µw will impact planktonic life as well. I usually shoot for around 60,000 µw/cm2 which will keep the water nice and clear while also eliminating bacterial blooms and controlling waterborn algae.

FWIW.. The suggestion of 260-300 GPH for a 50 watt sterilzer is insane. That is 180,000 µw/cm2 + and will kill anything that passes through it including plankton, copepods etc. Very poor advice from the mfg and clearly they don't know what they are suggesting. This has been the case since they bought out EA and one of the many reasons why I would never recommend their products anymore. I wouldn't run less that 600GPH through that thing on a reef. If it's a fish only system, that's a different story. If you want good advice, go with AquaUV in the future. They know what they are doing and will provide sound advice with regards to their products in our applications.
FWIW, that's only their recommendation for dealing with parasites. They recommend 1500+ for bacteria/algae, so perhaps the lower flow is for fish only tanks.


earwicker7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 07:33 PM   #8
slief
RC Sponsor

 
slief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by earwicker7 View Post
FWIW, that's only their recommendation for dealing with parasites. They recommend 1500+ for bacteria/algae, so perhaps the lower flow is for fish only tanks.
The parasite rating is a fresh water rating and would also be suitable for a fish only marine tank but overkill. It's not appropriate for a reef tank. Once upon a time when Emperor was owned support by Emperor Aquatics, their recommendations were completely different than what Pentair is suggesting today. Unfortunately, the support techs there are ill informed when it comes to UV on marine aquariums. Especially reefs. As I said earlier, 90,000 will deal with parasites. Then again, you will never control marine ich with a UV. You may reduce the populations when it's in the free floating stages but it won't really help regardless of the flow rate. The parasite ends up in the substrate and or find their way back to a host long before any reasonable amount of them will be killed by the UV sterilizer.


__________________
Director Customer Support Royal Exclusiv USA
For All Royal Exclusiv & Bubble King questions please refer to our Sponsor forum: http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/fo...play.php?f=745

Current Tank Info: 480G display mixed reef, 90G sump, 90G refugium, 60G display refugium. Check out my build thread: http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1783476
slief is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 07:57 PM   #9
earwicker7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 150
I want it mostly for water clarification, but it would be nice to have some parasite killing capabilities if I need it in a pinch.


earwicker7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/24/2016, 10:16 PM   #10
HippieSmell
Occupy Reef Central
 
HippieSmell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orbiting
Posts: 4,141
AFAIK, UV damage is cumulative, so I'm not sure how much difference there is between low and high flow in a small closed system. One of the articles I read showed no decrease in water column bacterial counts between systems running and not running UV. The only article I've seen about higher organisms, such as ich, concluded that you can't ever eradicate anything from a closed system using UV. So, I think it's much easier to have too small a sterilizer than too large.


__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like bananas.

Current Tank Info: 78"x36"x27" acrylic, 6 Orphek Atlantik V3+ Compacts, MRC Orca Pro II w/washdown, CalcFeeder Pro AC3, Emperor Aquatics 80w UV, 80/20 aluminum stand, Vortech MP60's, Theiling Rollermat, GHL Profilux 3.1T EX, Kessil H380
HippieSmell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/25/2016, 03:46 PM   #11
earwicker7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 150
We are going to get a slightly larger pump so that I can hit the manufacturer recommended flow.


earwicker7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/25/2016, 03:48 PM   #12
earwicker7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by HippieSmell View Post
AFAIK, UV damage is cumulative, so I'm not sure how much difference there is between low and high flow in a small closed system. One of the articles I read showed no decrease in water column bacterial counts between systems running and not running UV. The only article I've seen about higher organisms, such as ich, concluded that you can't ever eradicate anything from a closed system using UV. So, I think it's much easier to have too small a sterilizer than too large.
This one is designed for around 150g more than my system... I have never heard anyone say going too big was a problem


earwicker7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/25/2016, 05:14 PM   #13
HippieSmell
Occupy Reef Central
 
HippieSmell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orbiting
Posts: 4,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by earwicker7 View Post
This one is designed for around 150g more than my system... I have never heard anyone say going too big was a problem
Didn't slief feel it's too big? Maybe he just had an issue with the flow rate. But, like I said, I'm not sure there's a big difference between flow rates on small closed systems.


__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like bananas.

Current Tank Info: 78"x36"x27" acrylic, 6 Orphek Atlantik V3+ Compacts, MRC Orca Pro II w/washdown, CalcFeeder Pro AC3, Emperor Aquatics 80w UV, 80/20 aluminum stand, Vortech MP60's, Theiling Rollermat, GHL Profilux 3.1T EX, Kessil H380
HippieSmell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/25/2016, 05:31 PM   #14
slief
RC Sponsor

 
slief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by HippieSmell View Post
Didn't slief feel it's too big? Maybe he just had an issue with the flow rate. But, like I said, I'm not sure there's a big difference between flow rates on small closed systems.
Flow rate was my concern, not size. As for bacterial counts, the important (denitrifying) bacteria that we are mostly concerned about colonizes in substrate and within the rocks. As such, UV filters aren't a real concern for that regardless of flows. Waterborn bacteria such as cyano and other waterborn bacteria that more nuisance than benificial will be impacted by UV which is a good thing. My biggest concern is that having too low a flow rate will impact and ultimately diminish pod populations as well as planktonic life over time and as such, we need to be cognizant of that and not run too low a flow rate. Especially considering that targeting parasite such as ich is pretty much an effort in futility with UV filtration in our tanks. Short of running it between systems where you might have a quarantine system plumbed directly to your main system, there really is no justifiable reason to go with excessively low flow rates that put you at 90,000 µw/cm + as you will be potentially doing more harm to the ecosystem than good.


__________________
Director Customer Support Royal Exclusiv USA
For All Royal Exclusiv & Bubble King questions please refer to our Sponsor forum: http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/fo...play.php?f=745

Current Tank Info: 480G display mixed reef, 90G sump, 90G refugium, 60G display refugium. Check out my build thread: http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1783476
slief is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/26/2016, 11:57 AM   #15
earwicker7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by slief View Post
Flow rate was my concern, not size. As for bacterial counts, the important (denitrifying) bacteria that we are mostly concerned about colonizes in substrate and within the rocks. As such, UV filters aren't a real concern for that regardless of flows. Waterborn bacteria such as cyano and other waterborn bacteria that more nuisance than benificial will be impacted by UV which is a good thing. My biggest concern is that having too low a flow rate will impact and ultimately diminish pod populations as well as planktonic life over time and as such, we need to be cognizant of that and not run too low a flow rate. Especially considering that targeting parasite such as ich is pretty much an effort in futility with UV filtration in our tanks. Short of running it between systems where you might have a quarantine system plumbed directly to your main system, there really is no justifiable reason to go with excessively low flow rates that put you at 90,000 µw/cm + as you will be potentially doing more harm to the ecosystem than good.



earwicker7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/26/2016, 12:00 PM   #16
earwicker7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 150
Don't know why that last post didn't include my response...

We're on the same page... I only want to get the bad stuff out, so a bigger pump is being ordered.


earwicker7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/26/2016, 12:22 PM   #17
ca1ore
Grizzled & Cynical
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 17,319
Much ado about nothing IMO. You'd be fine running at 1,300, or even lower than that. Water-borne planktonic populations in our tanks are largely irrelevant anyhow, and I have never seen any correlation to substrate dwelling pod populations and running a UV.


__________________
Simon

Got back into the hobby ..... planned to keep it simple ..... yeah, right ..... clearly I need a new plan! Pet peeve: anemones host clowns; clowns do not host anemones!

Current Tank Info: 450 Reef; 120 refugium; 60 Frag Tank, 30 Introduction tank; multiple QTs
ca1ore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.