Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 01/22/2017, 05:11 AM   #1
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
Phosphate reactor vs pouch in overflow

Is there an enormous advantage to running a reactor with phosphate remover vs just putting it in a pouch in a decent flow area?


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/22/2017, 08:30 AM   #2
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
A reactor will be more efficient but you can get by without one..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/22/2017, 08:40 AM   #3
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
let me ask, say on a scale 100% being a reactor removing it VS. having it in a pouch running though an overflow or something how would you rate the %



Last edited by midnightmadman; 01/22/2017 at 09:08 AM.
midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/22/2017, 12:03 PM   #4
Zatoichi
Registered Member
 
Zatoichi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 440
A phosphate reactor causes that media to Tumble by forcing water up from the bottom while putting a sack in the Overflow basically relies on the water to push through a satchel to make contact with all of the media surfaces also depending on how high flow your overflow is it might beat the media up and cause it to turn to dust

Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk


Zatoichi is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/22/2017, 01:22 PM   #5
TheReeferer
Registered Member
 
TheReeferer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 251
My experience has been that using a media bag cause the GFO turn into a solid chunk suggesting that water is not flowing through the media.

The reactor somewhat suspends it so water flows through it better but if not adjusted right, it can cause the GFO to condense into chunks as well.


TheReeferer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/22/2017, 04:16 PM   #6
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by TA-Designs View Post
let me ask, say on a scale 100% being a reactor removing it VS. having it in a pouch running though an overflow or something how would you rate the %
Not sure I've seen any published test or definite results one could quote..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/22/2017, 04:39 PM   #7
Sk8r
RC Mod
 
Sk8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 34,628
Blog Entries: 55
I've tried both. The reactor worked. The other didn't remotely work. But you do need to change the media monthly until clear results.


__________________
Sk8r

Salinity 1.024-6; alkalinity 8.3-9.3 on KH scale; calcium 420; magnesium 1300, temp 78-80, nitrate .2. Ammonia 0. No filters: lps tank. Alk and cal won't rise if mg is low.

Current Tank Info: 105g AquaVim wedge, yellow tang, sailfin blenny,royal gramma, ocellaris clown pair, yellow watchman, 100 microceriths, 25 tiny hermits, a 4" conch, 1" nassarius, recovering from 2 year hiatus with daily water change of 10%.
Sk8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/22/2017, 09:07 PM   #8
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
The reactor will be more efficient, but the media will work to some extend if water is forced through it. If it's just a bag sitting in a high flow area, I doubt it'll get much water flow, in reality. Putting it into a a filter that forces water through it should be fine, if you have a small filter available.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/23/2017, 08:23 PM   #9
neiltus
Registered Member
 
neiltus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 415
get a reactor, you will spend more money on gfo than you will on a reactor especially if your doing a bag in the sump (which did nothing for me)


__________________
Build Thread

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2592260
neiltus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 02:40 AM   #10
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by neiltus View Post
get a reactor, you will spend more money on gfo than you will on a reactor especially if your doing a bag in the sump (which did nothing for me)
Thanks
I got a little fishy 150 reactor
Only thing now is the media
I have Kent phosphate sponge
I've been researching and it works well but I think needs to be removed in about only 2 days ???


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 08:21 AM   #11
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
https://www.kentmarine.com/products/...hos-sponge.htm


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 11:52 AM   #12
GimpyFin
Registered Member
 
GimpyFin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sk8r View Post
I've tried both. The reactor worked. The other didn't remotely work. But you do need to change the media monthly until clear results.

This has pretty much been my experience too with bags. I've placed bags in the filter sock, between sump chambers where water flows through, and neither worked well. I've tried both gfo and aluminum oxide (phosphate sponge) this way. (Phosphate sponge needs to be changed quite frequently too or it can leach phosphate back into the tank, which is where the 1-2 day change interval comes from.) Putting in a small reactor w/ gfo, though, worked quite well for me.


__________________
Brian

Current Tank Info: 110 gallon
GimpyFin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 12:02 PM   #13
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
Thanks. So I think I'm going to pull it out tomorrow, which will be two days.. then use the second half of the container for another 2 days. After that I will switch to the GFO..

Is there any serious risk of it leeching back into the tank before two days? If so I will do it today (1 day)


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 12:06 PM   #14
Potatohead
Registered Member
 
Potatohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,596
It will only leach back if the tank has a lower phosphate level than the media


Potatohead is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 12:12 PM   #15
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
hmm. that's a tough one to call. My API phosphate test kit isn't the greatest, but its saying they are pretty low in the tank from what I can tell. Maybe between .3ppm - .1ppm somewhere


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 02:58 PM   #16
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
As stated, GFO won't leach phosphate back into the water column unless some other method is used to drop the level even lower than the GFO did. For example, dosing lanthanum chloride into your tank might be able to do that.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 03:53 PM   #17
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertoni View Post
As stated, GFO won't leach phosphate back into the water column unless some other method is used to drop the level even lower than the GFO did. For example, dosing lanthanum chloride into your tank might be able to do that.
thanks. and the Kent Phosphate Sponge (white cracked) works the same, or it will either way once its exhausted? Is that correct?


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2017, 05:06 PM   #18
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
The other media likewise will leach back under certain circumstances. I think the Kent Phosphate Sponge should be safe enough, although they don't list the material. I'd stick with GFO, since some phosphate absorbers (those based on aluminum compounds) sometimes cause problems for certain corals.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/25/2017, 10:14 PM   #19
azsoccerpop
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Gilbert, Az
Posts: 232
midnightmadman would you mind posting your results on this thread? I am running Phosban in a media bag inside of my filter sock and was looking at a TLF 150 with GFO as an alternative. right now my PO4 is at .1 using NYOS test still dealing with various forms of algaes and already went from diatoms to green hair to cyano. Thanks


azsoccerpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/26/2017, 11:51 AM   #20
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsoccerpop View Post
midnightmadman would you mind posting your results on this thread? I am running Phosban in a media bag inside of my filter sock and was looking at a TLF 150 with GFO as an alternative. right now my PO4 is at .1 using NYOS test still dealing with various forms of algaes and already went from diatoms to green hair to cyano. Thanks
My test kit isn't the greatest, but looks like they went from about +.3 to pretty much 0 in 3 days. But like I said its an API phosphate test kit and very hard to read for sure.


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/26/2017, 12:39 PM   #21
david.faik
Registered Member
 
david.faik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 83
Phosphate reactor vs pouch in overflow

I hung GFO in sacks in my refugium, a small tunze blows some water over the sacks. My phosphates were high and I reduced by 0.2, then once the drop tailed off (about five days) I replenished the sacks.

I didn't like the sacks in my overflow as the netting collected a lot of detritus. Also it's easier for me to access the sump than the overflow area. Making my routine chores as easy as possible is important to me.

Have to rinse the sacks in the sump every two weeks. Plan on swapping out the media every month and cleaning the filter sacks. I'll adjust the quantity of GFO to last just over a month once I have figured it.

Had no clumping problems.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


__________________
Using Tapatalk

Current Tank Info: Mostly tangs, soft & hard corals
david.faik is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/26/2017, 01:13 PM   #22
ReeferNtraining
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Fairborn, Ohio
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightmadman View Post
My test kit isn't the greatest, but looks like they went from about +.3 to pretty much 0 in 3 days. But like I said its an API phosphate test kit and very hard to read for sure.
I too use the API test kit. That kit is ridiculously bad. Please explain how you determined you had .3 while using that test kit? That chart goes from 0 to .25 to .5.

I was skeptical of the test kit and tested my tank water against straight distilled water. I could not tell a difference in either test tube. It looks less than .25 but both were definitely not yellow like the 0 result shows on the card.


__________________
75g mixed reef; Skimz U34;2-Prime HD's; Synergy overflow plumbed as a beananimal; Aquamedic 8.1 & 4.1 wavemakers
ReeferNtraining is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/26/2017, 01:56 PM   #23
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReeferNtraining View Post
I too use the API test kit. That kit is ridiculously bad. Please explain how you determined you had .3 while using that test kit? That chart goes from 0 to .25 to .5.

I was skeptical of the test kit and tested my tank water against straight distilled water. I could not tell a difference in either test tube. It looks less than .25 but both were definitely not yellow like the 0 result shows on the card.
I used The Force
But really, I actually doubled up the amount of test water and drops in a small clear measuring cup. It seemed to help see the color a little more.


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/26/2017, 04:10 PM   #24
crawlerman
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 503
I was using API and it was showing slightly lighter than .25. I bought the Hannah Phosphorous checker and maxed it out at .6. I put phosguard in a media bag while waiting for gfo and a reactor from BRS. Phosphates remained above .6 until my second round of GFO in the reactor (1.5 cups each time for 200g volume). I would not count on API tests for anything other than cycling.


crawlerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/26/2017, 04:21 PM   #25
midnightmadman
Registered Member
 
midnightmadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by crawlerman View Post
I was using API and it was showing slightly lighter than .25. I bought the Hannah Phosphorous checker and maxed it out at .6. I put phosguard in a media bag while waiting for gfo and a reactor from BRS. Phosphates remained above .6 until my second round of GFO in the reactor (1.5 cups each time for 200g volume). I would not count on API tests for anything other than cycling.
I'm going to look for another test kit. I just don't want to spend so much $ on one LOL
Anyone have a used kit that's better then API?


midnightmadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.