Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Do It Yourself
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 01/19/2006, 09:34 AM   #1
jmccalip
Registered Member
 
jmccalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 240
Schedule 80 vs Schedule 40 bulkheads?

Sorry, I can't search.

Sorry. The search function has been temporarily disabled due to high server load. Please try your search again in a few minutes.

I just ordered a Schedule 40 1 1/2" bulkhead off marinedepot to connect to my panworld 50px-x. I was wondering if I should upgrade to a Schedule 80? Is it worth it for low pressure aquarium plumbing? Thanks


BTW: I havn't drilled the hole yet, but I would be mad if I wasted $8.50 on this bulkhead....


jmccalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 09:48 AM   #2
DHyslop
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 1,085
I haven't used an 80 but I understand the machining is better (less leaking) and they're more robust (less prone to cracking). The return on my 75 goes through a bulkhead, and I'm having trouble with my rigid plumbing putting a bit of torque on it and the gasket leaking. I think the best solution for me is to switch it over to spaflex, because I don't want to take the whole thing down and drill out a larger hole for a schedule 80 bulkhead.

Dan


DHyslop is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 11:05 AM   #3
jmccalip
Registered Member
 
jmccalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 240
Well then mine should be OK. The bulkhead will connect directly to the pump(well, 6" of 1.5" tubing).


__________________
.
jmccalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 11:55 AM   #4
manderx
Registered Member
 
manderx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Christiansburg, VA
Posts: 4,893
i'd want 80 if i was threading into the flange side of the fitting (a bit too tight and/or too much tape can split them). otherwise, most people go with 80 just because they are a bit sexier looking.


manderx is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 06:00 PM   #5
xtrstangx
Premium Member
 
xtrstangx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shawnee, Kansas
Posts: 4,568
I'm going with all Schedule 80's on my new tank. I don't want to have a bulkhead leak when I'm on vacation/out of town and let 100+ gallons of water go on the floor.

If its already drilled and you can't drill it out more, make sure you don't twist the bulkhead or torque it funny.


xtrstangx is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 07:05 PM   #6
javajaws
Premium Member
 
javajaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 1,620
If you have a choice, definitely go with 80. The sched 40 ones just break way too easy during installation. Talk about wasting $8.50 the fast way...


__________________
Everyone has an opinion. Accept the fact now that someone isn't going to like yours sooner or later.

Current Tank Info: 110g in-wall, ATI 8x54w T5, 2xMP40es, SRO XP-2000i, 2-part Ca/Alk, Apex controlled
javajaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 07:44 PM   #7
jmccalip
Registered Member
 
jmccalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 240
Would a double threaded schedule 80 work with all my schedule 40 parts? With such low PSI though, I just don't see how schedule 40 wouldn't work. I'm kinda tight on money right now, couldn't I just drill the hole out later for a larger bulkhead? Al I have to do is make a wood jig to hold it in place.


__________________
.
jmccalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 07:44 PM   #8
rsteagall
Registered Member
 
rsteagall's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rockvale, TN (close to Murfreesboro)
Posts: 1,612
most people have the trouble of overtightening, thats why it breaks thus why the suggestion is to get sch 80.


__________________
Ryan

Current Tank Info: One hand holding a beer, the other in the tank, and my toes typing on the keyboard. Drunks, reefing, and keyboards do mix in a 5GAL bucket with a 1200 MJ!
rsteagall is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 08:12 PM   #9
javajaws
Premium Member
 
javajaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 1,620
Yeah...it has nothing to do with water pressure...


__________________
Everyone has an opinion. Accept the fact now that someone isn't going to like yours sooner or later.

Current Tank Info: 110g in-wall, ATI 8x54w T5, 2xMP40es, SRO XP-2000i, 2-part Ca/Alk, Apex controlled
javajaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 08:14 PM   #10
jmccalip
Registered Member
 
jmccalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 240
I hand tightened the smaller 1" one(schedule 40), and it never felt like it was going to break. If seals are a probelm I can just get some EDPM ones off mcmaster for like $0.50 since my brother orders from there all the time.


__________________
.
jmccalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/19/2006, 08:20 PM   #11
jmccalip
Registered Member
 
jmccalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 240
Alright, thank a lot everyone!


__________________
.
jmccalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.