Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 01/24/2006, 04:44 PM   #1
shawnaus17
Registered Member
 
shawnaus17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
Do you think

I am upgrading my lighting one last time. I am getting 2 250 watt metal halide 14000K with 110 watts of Aticnic. Will this be enough to keep a LSP/Soft coral tank and maybe some low light SPS at the top?


Shawn


__________________
To see a world in a grain of sand,
And a Heaven in a wild flower,
To hold infinity in the palm of your hand,
And an eternity in a hour.
-William Blake-

Current Tank Info: 40 Gallon
shawnaus17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2006, 04:47 PM   #2
twon8
Formally registered membe
 
twon8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: slightly sw of richmond, va
Posts: 5,920
what size tank


twon8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2006, 05:27 PM   #3
xtrstangx
Premium Member
 
xtrstangx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shawnee, Kansas
Posts: 4,568
In your 55g? Yes, plenty of light for SPS anywhere in the tank. I'd feel fine with those lights on a 120g with SPS anywhere.


xtrstangx is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2006, 05:30 PM   #4
j0tca
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 916
That about exactley the lighting I use on my 6' 120 and find it quite satisfactory. I've had no trouble growing sps, and my clams are happy.

I think you're good to go.


j0tca is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2006, 05:31 PM   #5
j0tca
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 916
Although I'm thinking of adding another 2x110W actinics, but I think that's just my fiddling nature rather tahn any real need.


j0tca is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2006, 05:37 PM   #6
kabboord
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 557
I have (2) 250 watt 14k Hami's and (2) 110 watt Actinic VHO's on my 90 (24" deep) and sometimes I think its too much. My lights are like 6" off the water and the top of my rockwork is about 6 inches below the water. About half of the corals I put on the very top will slowly bleach out and lighten up for about the first six months. Granted the growth on them is still phenominal, but they do lighten up. I also run a 10 hour photoperiod. After 6 months, they seem adapted to it, color up very brightly and still grow very quick. I'm thinking of redoing my rock work so its much lower in the tank. I can put SPS on the bottom of my tank and they still get great color and great growth. The bottom is starboard. I think 500 watts would be too much for anything less than a 90. A 75 is the same as 90, just 18" of depth versus 24". I think that that would actually be too shallow for a 75 unless you had very minimal rockwork. I would suggest going with 175's would be better, I think they make double ended 150's, from what I've heard the double ended work very well.


__________________
Where is my mind? Where is my mind? Where is my mind? Way out in the waters, see it swimmin? I was swimmin in the carribean, animals were hiding behind the rock, except the little fish...

Current Tank Info: 90 Gallon Reef
kabboord is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2006, 05:58 PM   #7
shawnaus17
Registered Member
 
shawnaus17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
sorry i have a 90 30" tall


__________________
To see a world in a grain of sand,
And a Heaven in a wild flower,
To hold infinity in the palm of your hand,
And an eternity in a hour.
-William Blake-

Current Tank Info: 40 Gallon
shawnaus17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/24/2006, 07:08 PM   #8
twon8
Formally registered membe
 
twon8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: slightly sw of richmond, va
Posts: 5,920
what dimensions? i have two 250s on my 90 , but it is a standard
30" is pretty deep so you might want to consider 400w, If you get a good reflector i think you could maybe get bye with one 400, which would be cheaper than 2 250s, both initially and over the long term both in energy and in bulb cost. I am assuming since its 30" deep its not 48" long.


twon8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.