|
|
|
02/24/2006, 07:04 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: terre haute in.
Posts: 56
|
bioload opinions?
I am considering purchasing a 95 gal wave tank with a 30 gal sump, and a asm g2 protein skimmer. below I have listed the fish that I may put in it. I would like everyones opinion of if they think that it would be too much bioload.
2 ocellaris clown fish 1 foxface lo 1 gold headed sleeper goby 1 neon pseudochromis 1 mandarin goby 1 court jester goby and maybe a harlequin tusk fish |
|
|
|
02/24/2006, 07:56 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Posts: 2,103
|
I'm sure the bioload would be okay but are you planning on adding coral or just a FO or FOWL?
__________________
I feel more like myself now than I did before. Current Tank Info: 120g mixed reef, 2 x 250W DE MH, 2 x 54w T5, MSX 200 SKimmer, 2 Koralia 4's, 40g fuge/sump, QT |
|
|
|
|
02/24/2006, 07:57 PM
|
#3 |
|
23.5 Degrees
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 5,531
|
Go with the G3.
__________________
KIRSTEN REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE Reefer stabs Reefer in back over quarrel. Current Tank Info: 150g, 58g |
|
|
|
|
02/25/2006, 01:27 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 2,360
|
Should be a very average bioload, IMO. Be careful with the mandarin in a 95 -- you will probably need a pretty big refugium to supply enough pods.
__________________
Unattended children will be given double shot espresso and a free puppy. Current Tank Info: 125g FOWLR -- Conversion Back To SPS In Progress |
|
|
|
|
02/25/2006, 07:11 AM
|
#5 |
|
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 7,384
|
I think the tusk might be a little too much. But other than that, looks good
__________________
We Don't Have a Signature..... Current Tank Info: 125 Gallon Reef |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
