Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 04/06/2006, 09:03 AM   #1
Tiger3147
Registered Member
 
Tiger3147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
90 or 75 gallon?

I have a stand/canopy for a 75/90 gallon aquarium but have yet to purchase the aquarium its self. What i am wondering is for the extra 50 bucks or so i can get the 90 gallon so i figure why not. but the canopy is already retrofited with 4 110 watt VHO's and i worry that it will not be enough for such a deep tank.

Upgradeing my lighting at this point is just not posible with a shallow canopy at only 4 inches i would need a whole new canopy on top of a MH retro fit kit. However 50 bucks for 15 more gallons of space sounds like the better deal and i know i will just want the bigger one as soon as i get the 75 home anyway.

So i guess my question is if i go with the 90 what would i be able to keep as opposed to the same set up on the 75. I can always upgrade my lighting later but i wanted to make sure i would have enough options with the 90 in the meantime.


Tiger3147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 09:18 AM   #2
jjmatti
Premium Member
 
jjmatti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 517
Why bother?? Go with the 75 gallon for now and it will make a great frag tank in the future... Once your a few months in and your fully addicted to this hobby you wont even think about a 90. you will want to go straight to a 265...
I remeber when I got my 75 and had 1 Oscar in it.. I thought the tank was HUGE !!!! Now I look at it and it is so tiny...

I vote 75 Gallon... For the sake of saving money now just to spend it all later.


jjmatti is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 09:29 AM   #3
Stile2
Registered Member
 
Stile2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yucaipa, California (some little town you've never heard of)
Posts: 1,624
I think it depends not on size, but dimensions. What are the dimensions?

Keith


__________________
If you have a college degree, you can be sure of one thing. You have a college degree!

Superman owns Chuck Norris Pajamas!!

Current Tank Info: 77 Gallon Custom peninsula 3 sides viewable, DIY Steel Stand, OM Squirt, 2 x 250 w MH, 2 x 95 w VHO, DIY Skimmer
Stile2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 09:46 AM   #4
Tiger3147
Registered Member
 
Tiger3147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
Well thats what i am worried about the 90 galon is a 24 inch deep tank. So lighting it would be difficult with VHO. but i guess i could just keep things higher in the tank? is that what you ment by deminsions.


Tiger3147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 09:47 AM   #5
davocean
Registered Member
 
davocean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,655
90 is such a good size IMO
I've been happy w/ mine for years
Yes, of course I want something twice the size, and mainly for my nems that have become huge, but when that time comes you're going to need all new stuff anyway.


__________________
There's a fine line between owning your tank and your tank owning you!

Current Tank Info: SCA 120g RR Starfire, Tunze silence 1073.02 return, 40g sump w/ fuge, SWC Extreme 160 cone skimmer,Geismann reflexx 4xT5, 2x Panorama Pro LED strips, Vortech MP40QD
davocean is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 09:50 AM   #6
benray4fun
Registered Member
 
benray4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hartford, CONNECTICUT
Posts: 1,147
Tiger,
I have a 90g with the exact same 4x110w vho's and I can keep just about anything including anemones. You'll be set for a year before you have to replace the bulbs and you can order or build your own custom canopy with halides installed, but you only get one chance to get a 90g for fifty bucks... so I say vote your heart and go with the 90g. Don't forget it takes a year before a deep sand bed really comes to life anyways...


benray4fun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 10:07 AM   #7
Stile2
Registered Member
 
Stile2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yucaipa, California (some little town you've never heard of)
Posts: 1,624
If the 90 is 24" deep then I say go for the 90. How wide, front to back? And how long?

Keith


__________________
If you have a college degree, you can be sure of one thing. You have a college degree!

Superman owns Chuck Norris Pajamas!!

Current Tank Info: 77 Gallon Custom peninsula 3 sides viewable, DIY Steel Stand, OM Squirt, 2 x 250 w MH, 2 x 95 w VHO, DIY Skimmer
Stile2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 10:11 AM   #8
Tiger3147
Registered Member
 
Tiger3147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
same deminsions as a 75 just deeper i belive that is 48 inches long and 17 inches back?


Tiger3147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 10:33 AM   #9
Stile2
Registered Member
 
Stile2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yucaipa, California (some little town you've never heard of)
Posts: 1,624
IMHO, 17" front to back will limit aquascaping, but I would still go for the 90.


__________________
If you have a college degree, you can be sure of one thing. You have a college degree!

Superman owns Chuck Norris Pajamas!!

Current Tank Info: 77 Gallon Custom peninsula 3 sides viewable, DIY Steel Stand, OM Squirt, 2 x 250 w MH, 2 x 95 w VHO, DIY Skimmer
Stile2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 11:35 AM   #10
Tiger3147
Registered Member
 
Tiger3147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
ah, its acually 18 inches back to front if that inch really makes a huge diffrence.


Tiger3147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 11:55 AM   #11
kclewis
REEFER
 
kclewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Beautiful Bargersville, IN
Posts: 383
i had the same problem, if you want to call it a problem, and went with the 90. now i wonder why i even considered the 75.


__________________
#RageRestRepeat \mm/
kclewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 12:06 PM   #12
giants4pc
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: connecticut
Posts: 1,699
How much extra weight is it. I have a 75 and want to upgrade to a 90. My sump was designed for a 75 and mine is acylic. I wonder if it could withstand the extra weight. The stand/sump is made out of thick acylic.


giants4pc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 12:08 PM   #13
Tiger3147
Registered Member
 
Tiger3147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
Yea i can see myself thinking the same thing. It just scared me when i found little to no 90 gallon set ups on here without MH. I guess at worst i can keep things closer to the light in the mean time. Anyone have some pictures or threads about VHO only tanks near this size or is it just not done that often.


Tiger3147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 12:10 PM   #14
Tiger3147
Registered Member
 
Tiger3147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
Yea i worried about the weight for a moment too but i figured those 15 gallons and 50 or so pounds of rock would not make or break me in a apartment. But that may just be wishful thinking.


Tiger3147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 12:13 PM   #15
giants4pc
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: connecticut
Posts: 1,699
however...glass weighs more than acylic...that needs to be factored into the equation as well.


giants4pc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 12:15 PM   #16
Tiger3147
Registered Member
 
Tiger3147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
Ah, i missed that slight detail, i tend to do that alot these days


Tiger3147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 12:24 PM   #17
Maker
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 81
Go with the 90 gallon. The extra height really shows off a reef aquarium. You're VHO lighting will be plenty for that tank. If you do decide to get SPS corals you'll want to place them higher in the tank I would think.

FWIW, my LFS has a 120 gallon tank (6" deeper than the 90) setup with 4 110w VHO for about 2 years now. It is gorgeous! The colors really pop out at you!

Maker


Maker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 12:38 PM   #18
ste6168
Registered Member
 
ste6168's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,066
i dunno, i would go for the 75g just because i have one and love it... I think the 90's although i think the height is to much, the same reason i do not like 120's. IMO your options should be between a 75 and 90, but a 75 and 180. I know you have a stand and canopy already for a 4 foot tank, but who cares... factor in the 180 now cause your going to want it in a year.


ste6168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 01:07 PM   #19
trmiv
Registered Member
 
trmiv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,082
Get the 90. I actually bought a 75 and ended up selling it and getting a 90 before I set it up. The 75 was just too short, I wanted that extra height.


__________________
Current tank: Red Sea Reefer 350 Deluxe, Avast Marine Pegleg 180 skimmer, Gyre 150, Eheim 1262 return
trmiv is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 01:15 PM   #20
Biggie
Moved On
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 785
Talking

Had 90 as my first tank still makes me happy, So I doubled it and got a 180 and keep the first 90 as hospital/frag tank now Im 3 times 90 happy! More water more happy!!


Biggie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 01:33 PM   #21
fish1219
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vestal, NY
Posts: 378
I had the same decision to make this year between the 75 and 90. Was concerned about the lights on the 90 over the 75. I was using VHOs on my 45gal. When I upgraded I switched some of the VHOs to T5HOs with SLRs (Single Lamp Reflector). I don't think you will have a problem with the 90. I purchased the 90 for the extra capacity and am very happy with it.


fish1219 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/06/2006, 01:44 PM   #22
Tiger3147
Registered Member
 
Tiger3147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
yea i will likely get the 90. however giants4pc has got me slightly unsure about the weight in a second story apartment.would i be correct in assumeing if a 75 would be fine weight wise the 90 would be as well?


Tiger3147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.