|
|
|
06/28/2006, 11:10 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 568
|
Seachem Salt
Is seachem salt as good as TM Pro? Seachem is about $20 cheaper and I have heard a lot of good things about it. I just want to know what everyone else has to say.
|
|
|
|
06/28/2006, 11:15 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 227
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/28/2006, 12:29 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 568
|
Wow that just muddied the water a bit!
|
|
|
|
|
06/28/2006, 12:38 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 1,332
|
No, it's not comparable to TM, that's why it's $20 cheaper
__________________
Brent |
|
|
|
|
06/28/2006, 12:43 PM
|
#5 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 568
|
Why is it not comparable? Due to the borate? TM Pro has more trace elements? Just looking for more details and have seen people searching and trying to get group buys for Seachem.
|
|
|
|
|
06/28/2006, 01:33 PM
|
#6 |
|
Duke of Monte Fisto
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 722
|
TM
TM vs TM Pro.
I'd stick with normal TM, TM Pro is mixed in a neighboring country and there was a huge problem with inconsistent numbers ca/alk/mg (like seachem just came off of) ahwile ago, while TM has alwasy been very very reliable.
__________________
Dumbest Quotes Ever..... "Great color, great growth" closely followed by "all water parameters fine" |
|
|
|
|
06/28/2006, 02:10 PM
|
#7 |
|
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dyer, Indiana
Posts: 12,010
|
IMO the borate issue is not as excessive as it once was. I would have no problems trying that salt. IO is cheaper too, yet millions of people use it. I say go for it.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
