Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > Special Interest Group (SIG) Forums > Nano Reefs
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 08/01/2006, 07:20 PM   #1
beyondx4
Registered Member
 
beyondx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose
Posts: 12
Question Having trouble deciding to go Aquapod/Nanocube or AGA

Hi Nano-Reefers,
I'm coming back into reefing after a 5 year vacation and I find myself addicted to nano-reefs, spending hours at a time looking at all those beautiful little tanks in forums and galleries. Anyways, I've decided to startup a nano-reef in the twenty-something gallon range. I was initially very attracted to the all-in-one tanks: Nanocube, Aquapod, and M-tank (glass). The costs seem to be very reasonable and the refined looks are unbeatable. I started out planning to go with the stock fixtures, but then was persuaded by my cousin (who is a very serious reefer) to go with a MH because he'll be able to leave me some SPS fragments. I find myself looking at MH options in these all-in-ones and found out AHHHH! They're EXPENSIVE! Being a poor student coming back to school, cost is a big factor for me. I started looking for other ways around the situation and thought about going with an AGA or small acrylic aquarium setup along with a good MH fixture. I keep going back and forth between the two ideas and about to go CRAZY!

Anyways, I'd appreciate any recommendations from nano-reefers who'd had experience with these tank setups. Will I be missing much if I go with an AGA setup? Any real technical built-in advantages from the Auapods or M-tanks? (The M-tank was sorta appealing because it comes with a filter-chamber and protein skimming).


beyondx4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/01/2006, 09:45 PM   #2
HAMsmith
Registered Member
 
HAMsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 195
I went the Aquapod route thinking it would be cheaper. In the long run I think the cost would have been the same if I had gone with a 10 or 20L plus my options would be greater.

Also if you go MH on a Aquapod or Nanocube I think you lose the refined look.


HAMsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/02/2006, 10:59 PM   #3
jbrown11352
Moved On
 
jbrown11352's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canyon Lake ,Ca
Posts: 1,171
I went with a jbj 24g and couldn't be happier after 1 1/2 years!


jbrown11352 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/03/2006, 01:06 AM   #4
Kennyboy1984
Registered Member
 
Kennyboy1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLC, UTAH
Posts: 376
JBJ nano cube!


__________________
Anti-Tang Police

Current Tank Info: 24g nano cube, 125 g
Kennyboy1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/03/2006, 03:39 AM   #5
waterfaller1
Registered Member
 
waterfaller1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,343
I have seen the pros and cons of the NC and the aquapod. I like the fact that you can turn the actinics on only..on the aquapod, but overall the JBJ seems like it's made a little better.


waterfaller1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/03/2006, 06:59 AM   #6
Mark426
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,479
I have a JBJ 12 Gallon cube with 96W of PC. Upgrades from Nanocustoms.com Works for me.

IMHO...... MH lights on small/nano tanks are a MAJOR pain, heat and evap issues to name a few. The positive effects of MH equipped nanos are far outweighed by the negative. On larger tanks MH is fantastic!!!

If you dont go the "All-in-One" route, maybe think about something T-5's will fit on. A 20L with T-5's are really cool. Thats my next setup.


Mark426 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/03/2006, 09:16 AM   #7
Henry22
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 712
I think the choice all depends on the look you want. If your set ona MH then just go with an AGA because you lose the all-in-one look and design of the Aquapods or NC. I personally dont understand why people buy this all in ones but then take everything out that it comes with and mod everything and they only end up with the tank left. Seems like a waste of money to me. If you just want soft corals and some LPS then I think an all in one would work, but if you want the MH a AGA seems to be better buy where you can do what you want to it and buy a nice light and you would still be cheaper than the Aquapod with the MH light.


__________________
15 Gallon Tall Reef w/ a lonely orange spotted watchman goby

Current Tank Info: 15 gallon Tall Reef
Henry22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/03/2006, 10:46 AM   #8
ycrazyy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 327
I have a JBJ 24g that I started out with and ended up modding it. I installed a 70w MH in the hood which was not too difficult and upgraded the fans (also have a 36w PC actinic in there). I do not have heat issues and the MH certainly makes it look a lot nicer and I still have the all-in-one look. You can get a DIY 70w MH for around $125 +/-.

I am very happy with my JBJ and was actually going to get another before I decided to build my own 20g starphire tank to make an anemone tank with a 150w MH clip-on.

All in all, the all-in-ones are great tanks to start with but you will certainly want to modify them a bit for different flow and / or lighting, but even stock they do a good job.


ycrazyy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/03/2006, 10:47 AM   #9
ycrazyy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 327
I have a JBJ 24g that I started out with and ended up modding it. I installed a 70w MH in the hood which was not too difficult and upgraded the fans (also have a 36w PC actinic in there). I do not have heat issues and the MH certainly makes it look a lot nicer and I still have the all-in-one look. You can get a DIY 70w MH for around $125 +/-.

I am very happy with my JBJ and was actually going to get another before I decided to build my own 20g starphire tank to make an anemone tank with a 150w MH clip-on.

All in all, the all-in-ones are great tanks to start with but you will certainly want to modify them a bit for different flow and / or lighting, but even stock they do a good job.


ycrazyy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/03/2006, 05:12 PM   #10
beyondx4
Registered Member
 
beyondx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose
Posts: 12
Thanks alot for the information, guys. I may be set on a Glass M-Tank and eventually add in a 70watt HQI retro. Will post up my progresses soon!


beyondx4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/04/2006, 01:47 PM   #11
noschmo
Moved On
 
noschmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern Ca.
Posts: 564
i have three jbj nano but everyone has their preference based on what they ended buying. just get a tank, your not buying a new house or car!


noschmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/04/2006, 02:07 PM   #12
hgbarwick
Registered Member
 
hgbarwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Plant City, Florida
Posts: 1,390
Get a aquapod. I love mine it rocks!


hgbarwick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/04/2006, 05:28 PM   #13
ENraged
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Burlington vermont
Posts: 462
also dont forget http://nanotuners.nanocustoms.com/na...roducts_id=155
you do have other options for around the same price.


__________________
Save a reef.. frag your coral

Current Tank Info: 12 G Aquapod 10 gallon prop tank
ENraged is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.