|
08/07/2006, 05:56 PM | #1 |
100-mile-commuter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: almost nevada
Posts: 4,721
|
Recirc skimmer output feeding into fuge?
I'm trying out a new (due to limited stand space, guess I overbuilt my stand ) Sump + fuge setup where the fuge is in a separate 10 gallon tank from the sump. I'm replacing my current in sump Urchin Pro with an octopus recirculating skimmer, and in an effort to cut down on pumps, I was wondering what people's thoughts were on running the recirculating skimmer output to the fuge (input pump is in sump, goes through skimmer at about 60gph, which then overflows back to the main sump). My main concern is having the fuge be too clean after taking a very slow trip through the skimmer. I realize the normal sump setup skims the water first before passing it through to the fuge, but in those cases the skimmer hardly processes the water as much as in a slow recirculating setup.
Unbased fears? Non issue? |
08/07/2006, 06:06 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Suffolk, Virginia
Posts: 1,322
|
well if you have any macro in the fuge, I doubt it would get enough nutrients to grow... In other words... the only thing your fuge would be usefull for would be for pods and such...
JMO
__________________
-~ David ~- Current Tank Info: 30 gallon mixed reef, 250 watt MH, 20 gallon sump |
08/07/2006, 06:16 PM | #3 |
100-mile-commuter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: almost nevada
Posts: 4,721
|
Well my worry is the opposite Nitrates cannot be removed through skimming (only the longer amino acids and proteins which will eventually decompose into nitrates). I'm more worried about the microorganism population.
__________________
Custom electronics purveyor. blueAcro.com Current Tank Info: 90g SPS+mixed reef (10 yrs): LEDBrick LEDs, 40g custom sump, Ca reactor, chiller, Vortech, lots of custom electronics |
08/07/2006, 07:22 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Luling, La
Posts: 587
|
You will be fine. You algae will still grow. It is rediculous to think otherwise. If that was the case. A protein skimmer would be all you need to keep an aquarium.
Could you imagen a protein skimmer producing pure seawater, void of any algae causing nutrients? WOW!
__________________
I skim wet, therefore I am. Current Tank Info: 120 Monster |
08/07/2006, 07:44 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,982
|
I am going to change my system around so my skimmer gets all the raw tank water first. Currently my 'fuge and skimmer are split 50/50, but I get a ton of detritus in the 'fuge. I am not worried about the skimmer removing too much, I dont think its possible.
__________________
PBITAWA! Current Tank Info: None now. Past- 180g w/ 100g basement sump and 20g 'fuge. H & S skimmer, T'5s & Tunze |
08/07/2006, 09:10 PM | #6 |
Carpe Noctem!!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 8,548
|
My fuge ran that way for about a year. 100 gallon fuge fed from water from my MRC. Macros still grew, snails and crabs lived and appearantly the pod population didn't suffer either
__________________
Hop Current Tank Info: 300-gallon in-wall system (mixed reef) |
08/07/2006, 09:22 PM | #7 |
100-mile-commuter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: almost nevada
Posts: 4,721
|
Glad to hear Hop Saves on pumps
[looks at PG&E bill]
__________________
Custom electronics purveyor. blueAcro.com Current Tank Info: 90g SPS+mixed reef (10 yrs): LEDBrick LEDs, 40g custom sump, Ca reactor, chiller, Vortech, lots of custom electronics |
08/07/2006, 10:08 PM | #8 |
Carpe Noctem!!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 8,548
|
I hear ya! I had overkill on one pump that cost near $100 a month for just the one pump... That pump went bye-bye in a hurry.
__________________
Hop Current Tank Info: 300-gallon in-wall system (mixed reef) |
|
|