|
09/19/2006, 06:34 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 406
|
Dumb CL pump question: 0' head loss on closed loop, right?
just want to be certain I have this right. On a closed loop there is 0% loss due to head pressure since the water goes down to the pump with the same pressure that it comes back up with. There is loss due to elbows, valves, etc, though.
Put a simpler way, since water stays in the pipes going to and from the pump without the pump being turned on, head pressure has no impact on the pump. Right? So in a closed loop is it best to go for a pump that has more flow and less pressure, or vice versa? |
09/19/2006, 07:46 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ont. Canada
Posts: 1,076
|
Yep. That's correct.
|
09/19/2006, 08:54 AM | #3 |
Fish heads unite!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,384
|
Yes, you are correct about the head loss.
No, closed loops do not require pressure rated pumps. Waste of electricity IMO.
__________________
Peter SDMAS member Marine tanks since 1989. ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º> ·´¯`·.¸. , . .·´¯`·.. ><((((º> Current Tank Info: 240g butterfly and angel FOWLR. 15g QT. |
09/19/2006, 08:56 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 406
|
so an oceanrunner 6500 which does 1700gph at lower pressure with under 120 watts might be an ideal choice for a closed loop pump?
|
09/19/2006, 09:52 AM | #5 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bostonian in Chicago going to DC
Posts: 9,908
|
Quote:
Or a tinymight that does 1900 at about 90w.
__________________
NO TANKS!!! |
|
09/19/2006, 09:56 AM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 406
|
ooooh, ahhhhhhh, sounds nice!
|
09/19/2006, 10:13 AM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 406
|
I wonder how a SCWD or two would impact a sequence snapper on a closed loop.
|
09/19/2006, 10:16 AM | #8 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bostonian in Chicago going to DC
Posts: 9,908
|
Quote:
With any pump over 1500gph, you should be looking at 1.5" plumbing, minimum. The scwd is 3/8". Thats a serious restriction, and none of these pumps are made to handle that sort of backpressure. They'd still work fine, but you lose a ton of flow. Either go with a supersquirt, or look into heavily modifying a sqwd. Theres some good comments in this thread: http://reefcentral.com/forums/showth...9&goto=newpost
__________________
NO TANKS!!! |
|
09/19/2006, 12:12 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 406
|
how about a scwd off a manifold with other paths for the flow to take as well? could flow be balanced with valves?
|
09/19/2006, 12:43 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 6,923
|
I use the SCWDs, they are pretty cheap and mine have worked great. You do however lose a good bit of flow.
__________________
I found a way to make a small fortune running a reef tank. Start with a large fortune. Unofficial President of the SEACLONE haters club Current Tank Info: 125 mixed reef 110 lbs LR, 1x250watt XM 20K MH 2x175watt XM 20K MH on Magetics 2X96 watt actinic PC, 220 watt VHO actinic, 30 gallon refugium, closed loop system powered by Sequence Dart MSX 200 skimmer 38 gallon sump, Oceansmotions squirt |
09/19/2006, 12:53 PM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 406
|
what pump are you running them with and in what configuration?
Thanks! |
09/19/2006, 12:58 PM | #12 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bostonian in Chicago going to DC
Posts: 9,908
|
Quote:
__________________
NO TANKS!!! |
|
|
|