![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lewis Center, Ohio
Posts: 140
|
Macro lens Vs. Telephoto Lens
I'm new to photography and I want to take better close up pictures of my corals/fish.
I'm wanting to get a lense but I don't know what the differences are. On ebay, there is a 3x Telephoto Lens that I could get, but there is also a 10x High Def Macro Lens. Can someone explain to me what the differences are between a Telephoto lens and a Macro lens? Which one would you prefer to get if you can only get one for right now? My camera is a Sony Cybershot H5. The first pictures I took are in another thread below... I want it to be better! http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/sh...hreadid=951326 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura County
Posts: 808
|
Think of a telephoto somewhat akin to a telescope. Its for you to zoom in from far distances. Great for P.I.s, paparazzi and stalkers (oh, and nature/animal photography for when you want to keep your distance to prevent spooking your victims...er, I mean subjects).
A macro is meant for something a bit more than closeups. Similar to what you'd use a microscope for (but not quite so extreme). Excellent for photographing insects, action figures and that one really_wicked aptas- uh.. zoa in your tank. For me, I find macro more fun and useful than telephoto. Especially now that I live with my gf, my telephoto just sits on the shelf. Haha. Its a joke people! No, really! ![]() At 10x macro, you would have crazy magnification. Like, you could count the zits on an adolescent copepods face. Ok, well maybe thats exaggerating some but you get the idea... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 319
|
Macro by defintion is easliy explained when thinking about film. When the shot is captured, the size of the image on the negative is exactly life size.
A penny on the film would be the same size as a regular penny. I think that you are looking for / be more happy with a macro lens. HOWEVER, do some resarch. I don't belive that there is a true 10x macro lens. Most likely it is a tele-zoom with a macro setting which will not give you ture macro results. I hope that this helps more than confuses you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lewis Center, Ohio
Posts: 140
|
Great... I think I'm going to go with the Macro lens.
This is the one I was looking at... it's really cheap so it probably really isn't 10x Macro... but I'm thinking it will be better than what I have now. Macro 10x Lense Thanks everyone for the knowledge! I'll definitely do a comparison to see if it actually does work! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 643
|
The "macro" lens that you linked to there isn't really a macro lens. It's more along the lines of a macro diopter. It's very similar to just putting a magnifying glass right in front of your lens.
BTW, the 10x that's advertised isn't really true 10x macro. It's a lot less than that, but at least it'll allow you to get closer to your subject. The highest magnification macro lens that is around nowadays would be the Canon MP-65E, which gives you 1-5x. Beyond 2x, it can't really be handheld since the DOF is razor thin and your working distance is really narrow.
__________________
Eric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 1,196
|
Watch out for your Depth of Field on that "10x" macro, it's liable to be virtually non-existant.
__________________
Save a reef ... Grow your own ~ GARF Current Tank Info: 65G Oceanic ... : ... 5G Nano |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|